Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 9;9(11):2441. doi: 10.3390/cells9112441

Table 2.

Analyses of MSN morphology at 21 days by linear models.

# Response Predictors p Values 1
First Second First Second
1 TDL Treatment DA 3.362e−4 n.s.
2 BP Treatment DA 2.258e−5 n.s.
3 SL Treatment DA 5.357e−3 n.s.
4 TDL DA Treatment 2.711e−3 3.7215e−2
5 BP DA Treatment 1.494e−4 6.3311e−3
6 SL DA Treatment 9.064e−3 n.s.
7 TDL BP Treatment <2e−16 n.s.
8 BP TDL Treatment <2e−16 4.168e−3
9 TDL Treatment BP 1.187e−6 <2e−16
10 spines Treatment DA 5.948e−6 n.s.
11 spines DA Treatment 8.435e−4 3.245e−4
12 spines TDL BP 2.196e−9 n.s.
13 spines BP TDL 3.188e−6 6.618e−5
14 spines BP + TDL Treatment 4.139e−5 4.852e−4

1 The first p value reports the comparison of the trivial fit to the fit with the first predictor. It therefore reports whether the first predictor contributes meaningful information. The second p value reports the comparison of the model with the first predictor to the model with both predictors. The second p value therefore reports whether the second predictor adds meaningful information to the model. Abbreviations: TDL, total dendritic length; BP, number of dendritic branch points; SL, segment length; DA, striatal dopamine concentration; n.s., non-significant.