Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 10;12(21):20982–20996. doi: 10.18632/aging.103980

Table 3. Differential efficacy of the nomogram at different predicted probability.

Predicted probability Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV
Training cohort
0.50 95.8% 25.0% 80.2% 65.0%
0.60 90.9% 38.5% 82.4% 57.1%
0.70 80.6% 65.4% 88.1% 51.5%
0.80 61.2% 84.6% 92.7% 40.7%
Validation cohort
0.5 100.0% 23.8% 60.0% 100.0%
0.6 100.0% 38.1% 64.9% 100.0%
0.7 79.2% 47.6% 63.3% 66.7%
0.8 50.0% 71.4% 66.7% 55.6%

PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.