Table 3.
Completion composite of users that interacted with the modules.
| Ranka | Module | Users who had at least one interaction with the module (N=354), n (%) | Users who completed the module | Proportion completedb (%) | Completion compositec | |
|
|
|
|
n (%) | N |
|
|
| 1 | Cognitive distortion | 116 (32.7) | 41 (35.3) | 116 | 35.3 | 19.793 |
| 2 | Body scan | 46 (12.9) | 24 (52.2) | 46 | 52.2 | 17.217 |
| 3 | Self-compassion | 10 (2.8) | 6 (60.0) | 10 | 60.0 | 12.600 |
| 4 | Radical acceptance | 22 (6.2) | 18 (81.8) | 22 | 81.8 | 12.273 |
| 5 | Self-soothing | 52 (14.7) | 17 (32.7) | 52 | 32.7 | 10.788 |
| 6 | Thought journaling | 70 (19.7) | 41 (58.6) | 70 | 58.6 | 9.957 |
| 7 | Self-talk | 39 (11.01) | 21 (53.8) | 39 | 53.6 | 9.154 |
| 8 | Coping statements | 45 (12.7) | 16 (35.5) | 45 | 35.6 | 8.889 |
| 9 | Depression diet | 145 (40.9) | 42 (28.9) | 145 | 29.0 | 7.821 |
| 10 | Solution focus | 49 (13.8) | 29 (59.2) | 49 | 59.2 | 7.694 |
| 11 | Values | 39 (11.0) | 13 (33.3) | 39 | 33.3 | 7.000 |
| 12 | Transtheoretical | 139 (39.3) | 41 (29.5) | 139 | 29.5 | 5.309 |
aRank is based on the completion composite, with higher completion composite scores associated with a higher rank.
bThe proportion completed represents the ratio of users who completed each module to the users who had at least one interaction with the module.
cThe completion composite was calculated by multiplying the proportion completed by the number of interactions in each module to account for the differences in module length.