Table 5.
Guidelines for developing engaging chatbots.
| Tip | Definition | Rationale |
| Focus on the first module | Emphasis should be placed on the development of the first module to increase the chance of participants continuing to engage with the chatbot. | Most participants use only 1 module (or 2). It is important to provide the best intervention possible from the beginning. |
| Start small | Developers should focus on creating a few engaging and effective modules at the beginning rather than developing a large variety of untested modules. | On the basis of participant’s flow through Tess, most individuals tend to discontinue after the second module. |
| Develop comparable modules | To compare module utilization, modules should be built with similar characteristics (eg, length, number and type of questions, and the inclusion of links). | Utilization of modules that differ in characteristics may not allow for meaningful comparisons. |
| Balance length and complexity | Modules with fewer interactions may have better completion, but more complex topics may need longer modules. Developers should strive to find a module length that enhances intervention fidelity without compromising engagement. | Modules that had more interactions from the artificial intelligence had lower completion rates. |
| Be aware of personalization and standardization | Standardization provides streamlined data and requires less work, whereas personalization has more complexity and consequently requires more effort both in development and analysis. However, personalization may provide richer interactions. | Without understanding the efficacy of the overall modules, it is difficult to assess whether branching promoted engagement. |
| Holistic assessment | There is no single variable that can provide an accurate measure of utilization, rather a combination of such variables can provide a broad idea of general utilization and specific information regarding specific aspects of the intervention. | Number of messages, characters used, time spent, and completion should be considered alongside helpfulness and satisfaction in the assessment of chatbots. |