Table 2.

Amyris fermentation technology transfer results for the past 8 years

Transfer #	Product	Prior facility experience?	New process?	Risk score	Intensity of TT support effort	# of batches needed to meet expectations
1	1	No	Yes	2	Full Court Press	2
2	3	No	Yes	3	Lean	~ 3
3	1	Yes	Yes	1	Lean	Never (tried 2)
4	1	Yes	Yes	1	Moderate	1
5	3	Yes	No	0	Moderate	2
6	1	Yes	No	0	Lean	1
7	4	Yes	Yes	2	Heavy	4
8	1	Yes	No	0	Lean	1
9	1	Yes	Yes	1	Moderate	8a
10	5	No	No	2	Moderate	2
11	6	Yes	No	1	Lean	1
12	3	Yes	No	0	Lean	1
13	1	Yes	No	0	Lean	5
14	5	Yes	Yes	1	Lean	1
15	6	Yes	Yes	1	Lean	1
16	3	Yes	Yes	1	Lean	1
17	7	Yes	Yes	2	Heavy	2
18	7	Yes	Yes	1	Heavy	2
19	8	Yes	No	1	Lean	1
20	9	No	Yes	3	Lean	1
21	7	Yes	Yes	1	Heavy	1

^a90% of target performance was routinely achieved after three runs. Product #2 was scaled up prior to 2012. At some contract manufacturers, the participation by Amyris staff was limited due to CMO rules (i.e. for Product 9). Additionally, fermentation runs that failed due to equipment failure or contamination are not counted in tallying the number of batches needed to meet expectations