Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 2;47(11):913–927. doi: 10.1007/s10295-020-02295-3

Table 3.

Relevant challenges encountered during plate screen development and proposed potential solutions

Common challenges in plate screen 96-well plate Lab-scale bioreactor Details Potential solutions
Population size (total number of cells) 107 cells 1012 cells Tank processes allow for an extended growth phase due to controlled environment Match number of generations by adjusting the volume or density of the seed culture
pH control Uncontrolled Controlled base and/or acid addition One-sided pH control is required for most fermentation process Addition of buffering solutions, reduction of substrate/product concentration or biomass
Aeration Uncontrolled DO control through air/oxygen spargers and impeller speed adjustment Oxygen transfer in plates is typically lower than in tanks Characterize potential impact of oxygen limitation on strain performance. Reduction of oxygen uptake rate by adjustment of substrate concentration and cell density
Substrate load Low High Strains may be sensitive to excess carbon and produce unwanted byproducts leading to changes in pH Employ a glucose-limited main plate fermentation, either as batch or using glucose release system
Biomass concentration Low High Oxygen transfer and process control capabilities in plates are limited Include a scale-down factor in plate media composition
Carbon supply Uncontrolled Controlled Bioreactors are equipped with controlled feeding mechanisms Employ glucose release system and modify enzyme and substrate concentration to optimize release rate to generate fed-batch regimen
Evaporation High risk Low risk Evaporation in plates can lead to significant differences in a culture volume Determine the impact of evaporation on well-to-well CV at different time points. Minimize incubation time