Table 3.
Selection bias |
Performance bias |
Detection bias |
Attrition bias |
Reporting bias |
Overall assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study | Random sequence generation | Allocation concealment | Blinding of participants and researchers | Blinding of outcome assessment | Incomplete outcome data | Selective reporting | Other bias* | |
Sögaard (2010)[47] | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Unclear risk | Good quality |
Crum-Cianflone (2010)[48] | Unclear risk of bias | Unclear risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Unclear risk of bias | High risk of bias | Low risk | Poor quality |
Rodriguez-Barradas (2015)[49] | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | High risk of bias | Low risk | Fair quality |
Deloria-Knoll (2006)[50] | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Unclear risk | Good quality |
Feikin (2001)[51] | Unclear risk of bias | Unclear risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | High risk of bias | Unlcear risk of bias | Unclear risk | Poor quality |
Ho (2013) [52] | Low risk of bias | Unclear risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Unclear risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Low risk | Fair quality |
Lesprit (2007)[53] | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | High risk of bias | Unclear risk | Poor quality |
Peñaranda (2010)[54] | Unclear risk of bias | Unclear risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | High risk of bias | Low risk | Poor quality |
Sadlier (2016)[55] | Low risk of bias | Unclear risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Unclear risk of bias | Unlcear risk of bias | Unclear risk | Poor quality |
Slayter (2013)[14] | Unclear risk of bias | Unclear risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Unclear risk | Fair quality |
Tasker (2002)[57] | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Unlcear risk of bias | High risk | Poor quality |
NCT02717494 (2020)[56] | Unclear risk of bias | Unclear risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Low risk of bias | Unclear risk | Fair quality |
Unclear if important information on analysis, patient population or results was not available in manuscript; high risk if the statistical analysis may have introduced bias.