Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 15;13(22):5145. doi: 10.3390/ma13225145

Table 6.

Mechanical properties of recently developed hybrid biocomposites.

Matrix Fibers Manufacturing Process and Conditions Mechanical Properties Ref.
Vinyl ester/unsaturated polyester Bagasse/henequen Hand lay-up
Alkali treatment (5% NaOH)
Fiber length = 2 cm
TS 1 = 150 MPa
FS 2 = 159 MPa
IS 3 = 335 J/m
[201]
Epoxy resin (EpoxAmite 100) modified with multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNTs) Flax/carbon (FLXC)
Flax/glass (FLXG)
Flax/Kevlar (FLXK)
Mechanical stirring and hand lay-up
Dispersing agent: dimethyl ketone (2 propanone) with 1wt % CNT
Improvement of tensile properties with 1 wt % CNT
TS FLXC = 340.13 MPa
TS FLXK = 216.23 MPa
TS FLXG = 114.82 MPa
[154]
PLA PALF/coir fiber (CF) Hot press
Fiber loading: 30 wt %
CF:PALF = 1:1
Hybrid composite of C1P1 (15% CF 1 15% PALF) showed better mechanical properties respect to single fiber composites
TM 4 = 4.75 GPa
TS = 19.15 MPa
FM 5 = 4.86 GPa
FS = 33.04 MPa
IS = 4.24 kJ/m2
[202]
Epoxy resin Napier/carbon
Napier/glass
Vacuum infusion
Napier:carbon and Napier:glass = 30:0, 24:6, 18:12, 12:18, 6:24
Increase of carbon and glass vol fraction increased the flexural properties (max at 6:24% vol)
FS:
Napier/carbon biocomposites = 456.31 MPa
Napier/glass biocomposites = 124.94 MPa
FM:
Napier/carbon biocomposites = 25.76 GPa
Napier/glass biocomposites = 13.15 GPa
[203]
PLA Kenaf/coir (KCCK) Bamboo/coir (BCCB)
Kenaf/bamboo/coir (KBCCBK)
Hot press TS of KBCCBK = 187 MPa (20 and 78% higher than BCCB and KCCK)
FS of KBCCBK and BCCB = 199 MPa, 206 MPa (16% and 20% higher than KCCK)
FM of KCCK = 15 GPa (70% higher than others)
[181]
EpoxAmite 100 with MWCNTs as a nanofiller FLXC
FLXG
Wet lay-up
1 wt % concentration of MWCNT
Better impact properties and higher compressive strength of FLXG compared to FLXC [204]
Vinyl ester (VE) PALF/glass Automated spray up
Vol. ratio of fibers = 50/50
TS (71.86 MPA) increased by 171% compared to PALF-VE composite
FS (146.60 MPA) increased by 164.66% compared to PALF-VE composite
[205]
PLA-g-GMA Agave fibers/nanoclay particles Extrusion
Compatibilizer: glycidyl methacrylate (GMA)
Using GMA caused an increment in TS and FS
Nanoclay particles improved the tensile and flexural properties of the biocomposite
[206]
PLA Alkali treated sisal and coir fibers (ASF and ACF) Compression molding
Sisal:coir ratio = 7:3
IS increased by 22.8% to PLA/ASF
FS improved (92.6 MPa)
Decline of TS
[207]
PLA Treated Kenaf fiber (TKF)/montmorillonite clay (MMT) Screw extruder and compression molding
Alkali treatment (6% NaOH) Composition: 30TKF-1MMT-69PLA
FS and TS are improved by 46.41% and 5.87% than PLA/TKF [208]
Epoxy polymer (RenLam M- 1 and Hardener HY 951) Sisal/glass/portland cement particles Hand lay-up
Fiber-matrix mass fraction: 30/70
Stacking sequence: five layers of sisal/glass and glass/sisal
Increase of FS due to the cement microparticles and appropriate stacking sequence [209]
PHB Woven kenaf bast fiber (KBFw)/oil palm empty fruit bunches (EFB) Lamination and compression molding
Plasticizer: triethyl citrate (TEC).
Arrangement: 11 layers (3KBF, 2EFB, 6PHB)
11-layer hybrid composite with improved mechanical properties can be an alternative for some woody products
TS = 53.3 MPa
TM = 5.4 GPa
FS = 77.90 MPa
FM = 7.3 GPa
IS = 40.6 J/m
[210]
Epoxy resin PALF/coir Hand lay-up molding
Application environment: natural soil
Fiber/resin ratio = 40:60
Decrease of mechanical strength of hybrid composites in burial condition compared to the pure PALF-Epoxy composite [211]
Polyester resin Bamboo/PLF/coir Hand lay-up followed by hot compression molding
Fibers loading: 45%, 30% and 15% vol
Bamboo:PLF:coir = 15:15:15, 10:10:10 and 5:5:5
Higher mechanical strength of hybrid composite with 45% vol fibers loading compared to the single fiber-reinforced composites
TS: 136 MPa
FS: 93 KN
[212]
Unsaturated polyester Sugar palm yarn/glass Sheet molding process and hot press
Resin/fiber ratio = 70:40 wt %
Sugar palm yarn:glass ratio = 50:50 wt %
TS, TM, FS, FM, and IS of the hybrid composites increased with increasing glass fiber loadings [213]
polypropylene PALF/banana Compression molding
Chemically treatment with 5% NaOH
Fiber loading: 2, 5, 10 and 15 wt %
PALF/banana ratio = 3:1, 1:1 and 1:3
The hybrid biocomposite with 5 wt % fibers loading and PALF/banana ratio of 3:1 exhibited the best set of mechanical properties [214]
polyurethane Sugar Palm/glass Melt compounding and hot pressing molding process
Chemical treatment: 6 wt % alkaline + 2 wt % silane solution
The TS, FS, and IS of a hybrid composite improved by 16%, 39%, and 18%, respectively, after the chemical treatment [215]
Phenol formaldehyde Areca fine (AF)/calotropis gigantea (CG) Hand lay-up Composite with 17.5 wt % CG and 17.5 wt % AF fiber had maximum tensile, flexural, and impact properties [216]
Linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) Sugarcane bagasse (SB)/eggshell (Es) Compression molding
Fibers treated with titanium (IV) isopropoxide and silane coupling agent
TM and FM of the composites with treated fibers were higher than untreated fibers
Improvement of TM and FM with increasing of filler content up to 20/20 wt %
The TS, FS, and IS tended to decrease with increasing SB/Es content
[217]
Phenol formaldehyde resin Areca/sisal
Areca/glass
Areca/roselle
Hand lay-up
Divinylbenzene cross-linking agent
Areca/sisal hybrid biocomposites presented the highest TS and TM than others
FS and FM increased by hybridization of sisal, roselle, and glass fibers with areca
[218]
Thermoplastic SPS/agar (TPSA) Sugar palm starch (SPS) Hot press The TS and FS slightly improved, but the IS reduced [219]
Polyurethane foam Roselle fiber (RF) with spherical silica (silica-A) and amorphous silica (silica-B) Liquid molding FM increased with increasing wt % of silica-A and silica-B
TS increased with the increasing of silica-B and RF
Adding silica-A up to 0.75 wt % also increased TS
[220]
Epoxy Glass/Flax/Basalt (GFB)
Flax/Hemp/Basalt (FHB)
Glass/Hemp/Basalt (GHB)
Vacuum infusion process
Stacking sequence:
GFB: GFBBFG
FHB: FHBBHF
GHB: GHBBHG
Reinforcement volume: 21–23%
Flexural performance: GFB > FHB > GHB
[221]
Polypropylene Banana/Coir Twin-screw extruder and injection moulding
Fiber loadings (CF/BF/PP): 15/5/80, 10/10/80, and 5/15/80 wt %
Max strengths at Banana/Coir: 15/5 wt %
TS: 31.3316 MPa
TM: 760.29 MPa
FS: 31.336 MPa
FM: 762.326 MPa
IS: 51.6 J/m
[222]
Epoxy Banana/Jute Hand lay-up
Banana/jute ratio = 7:3
Better mechanical properties of the hybrid composite compared to mono composites
TS: 85.91 MPa
FS: 151.3 MPa
FM: 1.23 GPa
IS: 484.54 J/m
[223]
Epoxy Banana/Kenaf Hand lay-up
Banana/kenaf ratio = 40:60, 45:55, 50:50,
55:45 and 60:40
Better mechanical properties with the highest kenaf %:
TS: 58 MPa
TM: 0.28 GPa
FS: 24 MPa
IS: 15.81 J
[224]
Epoxy Sisal/Jute Hand lay-up
Jute/sisal ratio = 1:0, 1:3, 1:1 and 0:1
Fiber loading of 30 wt %
Better mechanical properties of 1:1 hybrid composite
TS: 102.08 MPa
TM: 2.03 GPa
FS: 361.9 MPa
FM: 17.5 GPa
IS: 30.1 KJ/m2
[225]
Polypropylene Sisal/Glass (SG)
Sisal/Carbon (SC)
Single extrusion machine and press consolidation
SG and SC ratio = 25/75, 50/50, 75/25 wt %
Hybrid composite of 25/75 wt % for both SC and SG showed better mechanical properties:
TS: 22.4 MPa
TM: 3.65 GPa
FS: 52.6 MPa
FM: 4.51 GPa
The addition of sisal fiber to pure carbon composite decreases mechanical properties
[226]
Polypropylene Coir/Coconut shell Twin screw extruder and injection moulding
Fiber/filler ratio = 1:0, 3:1, 1:1, 1:3 and 0:1
Reinforcement loading: 20 wt %
With a hybrid ration of 1:1, TS and TM increased 8% and 50% compared to the references, respectively
[227]
Epoxy Kenaf/Kevlar Hand lay-up
Three types of kenaf fiber: woven, UD, mat
Woven kenaf hybrid composite showed better mechanical properties compared to UD 6 and mat
TS: 145 MPa
TM: 3.37 GPa
FS: 100.3 MPa
IS: 51.41 KJ/m2
[228]
Epoxy Hemp/Sisal Hot press
Different layering sequence of fibers
The non-hybrid composites showed superior tensile and flexural properties than the hybrid composite due to the low compatibility of sisal/hemp fibers [177]
Epoxy Kenaf/Kevlar Hand lay-up followed by compression
Treated woven kenaf with NaOH
Layering sequence: 4-layer and 3-layer with a different skin layer
Reinforcement loading: 30 wt %
Mechanical properties of hybrid composite with 4-layer improved:
TS: 64.7 MPa
TM: 5.29 GPa
FS: 51.28 MPa
FM: 2.74 GPa
IS: 50.1 KJ/m2
Kevlar as a skin layer improved tensile and flexural properties, but kenaf as a skin improved IS
[178]
Epoxy modified with LENR 7 Kenaf/Glass Glass/kenaf ratio = 1:1
Treatment of kenaf with NaOH
Fiber treatment and adding of LENR to the matrix improved the mechanical properties:
FS: 68.1 MPa
IS: 13.1 KJ/m2
[229]
Polyester Kenaf/Glass Hand lay-up and hydraulic cold press
Kenaf/glass ratio = 3:7
Sandwich configuration with glass shell and kenaf core
Three types of kenaf: non-woven random mat, UD twisted yarn, plain-woven
Reinforcement loading: 35 wt %
UD and woven fibers had higher tensile and flexural properties, respectively:
TS: 194.6 MPa
FM: 291.6 MPa
[230]
Epoxy Jute/Glass Epoxy/jute/glass weight ratio = 69/31/0, 68/25/7 and 64/18/19 The addition of glass and jute fibers with a ratio of 64/18/19 showed the highest mechanical properties:
TS: 56.68MPa
FS: 28.81 MPa
FM: 1.83 GPa
IS: 5.49 J
[231]
Polyethylene Oil palm fiber (OPF) and clay particles Extrusion and injection molding
Alkali treatment of OPF
Reinforcement loading: 25 wt %
The 12.5:12.5 hybrid composite showed 11% and 49% improvement of tensile strength and modulus, respectively
[232]
Epoxy Sugar palm fiber (SPF)/Glass Hand lay-up
Benzoylation treatment on SPF
Glass fiber ratio: 30%, 50%, and 70wt %
Glass fiber ration of 70 wt % exhibited the best tensile properties: 55.7% and 50.5% improvement of TS and TM, respectively
Benzoylation treatment improved adhesion of fibers/matrix
[233]
Polypropylene Sisal fiber (SiF)/Cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) Melt-blending followed by injection molding
SiF/CNC loading (29:1, 27:3, 25:5, and 23:7 wt %)
Enhancement of matrix with MAPP 8 compatibilizer
Hybrid composite with SiF/CNC (27:3 wt %) showed highest TS (47.02 MPa), TM (2.82 GPa) and IS (38.62J/m) with 30.87% and 14.81% increment of FS and FM respectively
[234]
Epoxy Hemp/polyethylene terephthalate (PET) Vacuum-infusion The TS and FS of interwoven hemp/PET hybrid composites were 4% and 22% greater than woven hemp composites [235]
Epoxy Flax/Glass Compression-molding machine
Sandwich structure: outer layers of glass/epoxy and the core from Flax/Epoxy
UD hybrid composite [0G/0F] has a higher TS (408.25 MPa), TM (31.97 GPa), FS (591.25 MPa), and FM (39.84 GPa) compared to angle ply [0G/ ± 45F] hybrid composite and also flax/epoxy composite [180]
Epoxy Arenga pinnata fiber (APF)/polyester yarn (PET) Lay-up
Mg(OH)2 as a flame retardant (5 wt %)
APF:PET ratio = 0:5, 20:5, 35:5 and 50:5 wt %
Mg(OH)2 as a flame retardant
Hybrid composite with 20 wt % and 35 wt % APF had the highest TM (165.2 MPa) and TS (9.69 N/mm2), respectively
Increasing the fiber loading to the 50 wt % decreased the tensile properties
[236]
Ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM) rubber Kevlar fiber (KF)/Nano-silica (NS) Roll milling followed by compression molding TS, elongation-at-break, and TM values of EPDM significantly increased by hybridization with KF and NS:
TS: 4.94 MPa
TM:51.09 MPa
[237]
PLA Coir fiber (CF)/PALF
With alkaline treatment
Internal mixer followed by compression molding
CF:PALF ratios = 3:7, 1:1 and 7:3
Fibers loading: 30 wt %
Hybrid composite with higher PALF, C3P7 (CF:PALF = 3:7) exhibited the highest tensile properties:
TS: 30.29 MPa
TM: 5.16 GPa
However, the C1P1 hybrid composite presented the highest IS
[238]

1 Tensile strength; 2 Flexural strength; 3 Impact strength; 4 Tensile modulus; 5 Flexural modulus; 6 Unidirectional; 7 Liquid epoxidized natural rubber; 8 Maleic anhydride grafted PP.