Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 10;17(22):8305. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228305

Table 4.

Risk of bias in the included studies.

ID Authors/Year Design Dropout Rates (%) Risk of Bias
Absence of Randomness Insufficient Information Regarding Participant Characteristics Insufficient Information Regarding the Instruments and Measures Implemented Insufficient Information Regarding Results Associated Intervention Effectiveness Total
(Degree) (Degree) (Degree) (Degree) (Degree)
[60] Amoah et al., 2019 NC n/d High Low Moderated Moderated Moderated
[61] Atkins, 2019 NC n/d High High High High High
[62] Broome et al., 2013 NRC n/d High Moderated Low Moderated Moderated
[63] Gough and Cassidy, 2017 NRCr 52.9 High Moderated Moderated High High-Moderated
[64] Jitramontree et al., 2015 NC n/d High High High High High
[65] Kam, 2020 NC n/d Moderated High High High High-moderated
[66] Kuo and Chen, 2019 RCr 51.5 Low Moderated Low Moderated Low-Moderated
[67] Lee et al., 2018 NC 34.4 High High Moderated Moderated High-Moderated
[68] Levert et al., 2016 RCr 0.0 Moderated Low High High High-moderated
[69] Pejner et al., 2019 NRCr n/d High Low High High High-moderated
[70] Thompson et al., 2014 NRC 53.2 Moderated Low Low Low Low
Total High Moderated Moderated-High High High-Moderated

ID: the same as in the references section. n/d: no data. Design of the intervention: NRC: Non-Randomised Controlled intervention; RCr: Randomised Crossover intervention; NRCr: Non-randomised Crossover intervention; NC: Non-Controlled intervention. Source: Own elaboration based on the included studies.