Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 13;56(11):610. doi: 10.3390/medicina56110610

Table 5.

Comparative results of participants’ spinal alignment.

Items (Units) Time
(T)
Group (G) ANOVA (p-Value)
CON (n = 40) ERSG (n = 40) G T G × T
Trunk inclination (°) Pre 2.27 ± 1.25 2.41 ± 1.37 0.126 0.016 0.001
Post 2.40 ± 1.22 1.54 ± 1.14
Trunk imbalance (°) Pre 5.84 ± 2.21 5.87 ± 2.32 0.167 0.030 0.005
Post 5.99 ± 1.79 4.74 ± 2.36
Pelvic tilt (°) Pre 4.63 ± 1.41 4.68 ± 1.62 0.075 0.117 0.001
Post 4.95 ± 1.61 3.79 ± 1.67
Pelvic torsion (°) Pre 2.21 ± 0.91 2.26 ± 0.97 0.323 0.532 0.076
Post 2.35 ± 0.81 1.97 ± 0.96
Kyphotic angle (°) Pre 45.58 ± 8.15 44.26 ± 7.79 0.001 0.006 0.001
Post 46.88 ± 7.87 36.57 ± 7.26
Lordotic angle (°) Pre 39.61 ± 8.45 38.63 ± 8.73 0.017 0.045 0.004
Post 40.63 ± 9.80 33.03 ± 10.32
Surface rotation to the right side (°) Pre 4.17 ± 2.13 4.13 ± 1.95 0.103 0.504 0.005
Post 4.61 ± 1.56 3.43 ± 1.78
Surface rotation to the left side (°) Pre −4.07 ± 2.56 −4.17 ± 2.52 0.481 0.253 0.169
Post −4.14 ± 2.35 −3.41 ± 2.28
Lateral deviation to the right side (mm) Pre 5.80 ± 2.00 6.02 ± 2.20 0.766 0.523 0.202
Post 5.97 ± 2.05 5.51 ± 2.28
Lateral deviation to the left side (mm) Pre −5.42 ± 2.03 −5.63 ± 1.97 0.210 0.375 0.028
Post −5.86 ± 2.58 −4.60 ± 2.81

All data represent the mean ± standard deviation. CON, control group; ERSG, equine riding simulator group; ANOVA, analysis of variance. p-value was analyzed using a repeated-measures ANOVA test.