Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 13;12(11):3490. doi: 10.3390/nu12113490

Table 6.

Multivariable analysis: multinomial logistic regression taking the absence of orthorexia nervosa as the reference group.

Model 1: At Risk of ON vs. Absence of ON
Variable p aOR 95% CI
Cognitive restraint (TFEQ-R18) 0.333 1.12 0.89–1.42
Drive for thinness (EDI) 0.011 1.17 1.04–1.32
Ineffectiveness (EDI) 0.017 0.74 0.58–0.95
Hoarding (OCI-R) 0.024 1.30 1.04–1.64
Model 2: Presence of ON vs. Absence of ON
Variable p aOR 95% CI
Cognitive restraint (TFEQ-R18) 0.995 0.99 0.74–1.34
Drive for thinness (EDI) 0.862 1.02 0.84–1.23
Ineffectiveness (EDI) 0.111 1.12 0.98–1.28
Hoarding (OCI-R) 0.808 0.97 0.72–1.29

ON: Orthorexia Nervosa; TFEQ-R18: Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire; EDI: Eating Disorder Inventory; OCI-R: Obsessive Compulsive Inventory—Revised. Numbers in bold indicate significant p-values. Goodness-of-fit Pearson X2 = 355.03; p = 0.998; Nagelkerke Pseudo R2 = 0.219. Numbers in bold indicate significant p-values.