Table 6.
Model 1: At Risk of ON vs. Absence of ON | |||
Variable | p | aOR | 95% CI |
Cognitive restraint (TFEQ-R18) | 0.333 | 1.12 | 0.89–1.42 |
Drive for thinness (EDI) | 0.011 | 1.17 | 1.04–1.32 |
Ineffectiveness (EDI) | 0.017 | 0.74 | 0.58–0.95 |
Hoarding (OCI-R) | 0.024 | 1.30 | 1.04–1.64 |
Model 2: Presence of ON vs. Absence of ON | |||
Variable | p | aOR | 95% CI |
Cognitive restraint (TFEQ-R18) | 0.995 | 0.99 | 0.74–1.34 |
Drive for thinness (EDI) | 0.862 | 1.02 | 0.84–1.23 |
Ineffectiveness (EDI) | 0.111 | 1.12 | 0.98–1.28 |
Hoarding (OCI-R) | 0.808 | 0.97 | 0.72–1.29 |
ON: Orthorexia Nervosa; TFEQ-R18: Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire; EDI: Eating Disorder Inventory; OCI-R: Obsessive Compulsive Inventory—Revised. Numbers in bold indicate significant p-values. Goodness-of-fit Pearson X2 = 355.03; p = 0.998; Nagelkerke Pseudo R2 = 0.219. Numbers in bold indicate significant p-values.