Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 9;9(11):1101. doi: 10.3390/antiox9111101

Table 3.

Ophthalmologic data in the supplemented vs. the non-supplemented participants.

Variables T2DM CG p-Value
Baseline 38-Months Baseline 38-Months End of Study
+A/ω3 −A/ω3 +A/ω3 −A/ω3 +A/ω3 −A/ω3
BCVA RE decimal scale 0.8 (0.1) 0.7 (0.1) 0.6 (0.1) 0.9 (0.1) 0.9 (0.1) 0.9 (0.2) 0.002 ** 0.002 **
BCVA LE decimal scale 0.8 (0.2) 0.7 (0.1) 0.5 (0.1) 0.9 (0.1) 0.9 (0.2) 0.8 (0.1) 0.049 * 0.001 **
IOP RE mm Hg 15 (2) 15 (2) 15 (2) 15 (2) 14 (2) 15 (3) 0.415 0.432
IOP LE mm Hg 15 (2) 16 (2) 15 (2) 16 (2) 13 (2) 16 (2) 0.068 0.453
CMT RE µm 252 (32) 245 (29) 240 (28) 251 (33) 253 (35) 258 (40) 0.585 0.514
CMT LE µm 258 (55) 242 (37) 236 (46) 255 (36) 255 (43) 249 (35) 0.539 0.561

BCVA: Best-corrected visual acuity; RE: Right eye; LE: Left eye; IOP: Intraocular pressure; CMT: Central Macular Thickness; T2DM: Type 2 diabetes mellitus; CG: Control group. +A/ω3: Daily supplementation with antioxidants/omega 3 fatty acids; −A/ω3: No supplementation regimen. Values are mean (SD) for each eye. p-value (* p < 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.002) reflects statistical differences between the T2DM and CG of participants at the end of the study. Comparisons of BCVA and IOP were made using the Mann–Whitney U test. CMT was compared using the student t-test for unpaired samples.