Table 2.
Results of the mediation analysis of flourishing in the relationship between PsyCap and emotional exhaustion.
| Description of the Model | Coef. | SE | t | p | d | LCI | UCI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct effect | |||||||
| PCA→FLO | 0.727 | 0.022 | 32.365 | 0.000 | 3.55 | 0.683 | 0.771 |
| GEN→FLO | −0.063 | 0.027 | –2.303 | 0.021 | 0.12 | –0.116 | –0.009 |
| STA→FLO | –0.010 | 0.007 | –1.436 | 0.151 | — | –0.024 | 0.003 |
| EXP→FLO | –0.004 | 0.009 | –0.527 | 0.598 | — | –0.023 | 0.013 |
| Direct effect | |||||||
| PCA→EME | –0.767 | 0.076 | –9.978 | 0.000 | 0.56 | –0.917 | –0.616 |
| FLO→EME | –0.372 | 0.069 | –5.360 | 0.000 | 0.29 | –0.509 | –0.236 |
| GEN→EME | –0.164 | 0.070 | –2.322 | 0.020 | 0.12 | –0.302 | –0.025 |
| STA→EME | 0.033 | 0.018 | 1.846 | 0.065 | — | –0.002 | 0.069 |
| EXP→EME | 0.036 | 0.023 | 1.540 | 0.123 | — | –0.010 | 0.083 |
| Indirect effect | |||||||
| PCA→FLO→EME | –0.271 | 0.064 | — | — | — | –0.309 | –0.113 |
| Total effect | –1.038 | 0.058 | –17.749 | 0.000 | 1.09 | –1.152 | –0.923 |
Note: PCA = Psychological capital; FLO = Flourishing; EME = Emotional exhaustion; GEN = Gender; STA = Educational stage; EXP = Teacher experience. PsyCap scale (1–6), with higher scores indicating a higher level of PsyCap. Flourishing scale (1–5), with higher scores indicating a higher level of flourishing. Emotional exhaustion scale (0–6), with higher scores indicating greater levels of emotional exhaustion; Gender: 1 = Woman, 2 = Man; LCI = Lower confidence interval (95%); UCI = Upper confidence interval (95%).