Table 4.
Results of the mediation analysis of flourishing in the relationship between PsyCap and professional accomplishment.
| Description of the Model | Coef. | SE | t | p | d | LCI | UCI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct effect | |||||||
| PCA→PRO | 1.005 | 0.043 | 23.272 | 0.000 | 1.61 | 0.920 | 1.089 |
| FLO→PRO | 0.193 | 0.039 | 4.956 | 0.000 | 0.27 | 0.117 | 0.270 |
| GEN→PRO | –0.058 | 0.039 | –1.485 | 0.137 | — | –0.136 | 0.018 |
| STA→PRO | –0.028 | 0.010 | –2.790 | 0.005 | 0.15 | –0.048 | –0.008 |
| EXP → PRO | 0.005 | 0.013 | 0.437 | 0.662 | — | –0.020 | 0.032 |
| Indirect effect | |||||||
| CAP → FLO → PRO | 0.140 | 0.033 | — | — | — | 0.079 | 0.209 |
| Total effect | 1.145 | 0.032 | 34.924 | 0.000 | 5.53 | 1.081 | 1.210 |
Note: PCE = Psychological capital; FLO = Flourishing; PRO = Professional accomplishment; GEN = Gender; STA = Educational stage; EXP = Teacher experience. PsyCap scale (1–6), with higher scores indicating a higher level of PsyCap. Flourishing scale (1–5), with higher scores indicating a higher level of flourishing. Professional accomplishment scale (0–6), with lower scores indicating lower levels of professional accomplishment. Gender: 1 = Woman, 2 = Man; LCI = Lower confidence interval (95%); UCI = Upper confidence interval (95%).