Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 12;12(11):3466. doi: 10.3390/nu12113466

Table 3.

Subgroup comparison assessing the effect of GDM on associations between multiple micronutrient supplementation in pregnancy and size at birth.

Measure N Unadjusted for GDM Adjusted for GDM
Standardized β p‑Value Standardized β p‑Value
Weight 600 0.048 (−0.021–0.112) 0.2 0.031 (−0.037–0.095) 0.4
Length * 583 0.009 (−0.050–0.067) 0.8 0 (−0.058–0.059) 1.0
Head Circumference * 584 0.035 (−0.022–0.097) 0.3 0.036 (−0.022–0.098) 0.3
BMI * 582 0.046 (−0.021–0.109) 0.2 0.034 (−0.032–0.097) 0.3
Ponderal Index * 582 0.042 (−0.022–0.104) 0.2 0.034 (−0.029–0.097) 0.3
Flank skinfolds thickness * 584 0.040 (−0.038–0.112) 0.3 0.022 (−0.055–0.093) 0.6
Quadriceps skinfolds thickness * 585 0.042 (−0.022–0.106) 0.3 0.034 (−0.030–0.099) 0.4
Subscapular skinfolds thickness * 584 0.061 (−0.015–0.128) 0.1 0.052 (−0.025–0.119) 0.2
Triceps skinfolds thickness * 584 0.058 (−0.021–0.123) 0.1 0.050 (−0.029–0.116) 0.2

Values in the table only include data from pregnancies where GDM status was available. Standardized βs are presented as means (95% confidence intervals). All models adjusted for gestational age at birth, parity, smoking during pregnancy, offspring sex, and maternal pre-pregnancy BMI. * Models additionally adjusted for age at assessment.