Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 11;56(11):605. doi: 10.3390/medicina56110605

Table 2.

Comparative findings of FECF and microendoscopic cervical foraminotomy (MECF).

FECF; n = 143 MECF; n = 81 p-Value
Age 51.1 ± 10.1 50.7 ± 11.8 0.82
Female sex 28 (19.6) 9 (11.1) 0.13
Operative time 59.4 ± 15.5 68.2 ± 26.3 0.00
Improvement rate of MEP 272.7 ± 748.1 130.2 ± 377.1 0.03
NRS before surgery 4.7 ± 2.8 4.5 ± 2.8 0.62
NRS after surgery 1.2 ± 1.8 0.8 ± 1.6 0.04

Values are shown as the mean ± standard deviation or number (percent). FECF, full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy; MECF, microendoscopic cervical foraminotomy; MEP, motor evoked potential; NRS, Numerical Rating Scale.