Table 2.
Predictive models of pornography use: stepwise logistic regression (n = 1500).
Criterion: Pornography Use. Fitting Indexes: H-L(p-Value) = 0.385; N-R2 = 318; AUC = 0.790 (95%CI: 0.767 to 0.813) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Predictor | Contrast | B | SE | p | OR | 95%CI | |
Sex | Male vs. Female | 2.122 | 0.128 | <0.001 | 8.349 | 6.503 | 10.720 |
Sexual orientation | 0.019 | ||||||
Homosex. vs. Heterosex. | 0.221 | 0.425 | 0.603 | 1.247 | 0.543 | 2.867 | |
Ambisex. vs. Heterosex. | 0.702 | 0.307 | 0.022 | 2.019 | 1.107 | 3.682 | |
Non-defined vs. Heterosex. | 0.738 | 0.324 | 0.023 | 2.092 | 1.108 | 3.949 | |
Drugs use/abuse | 0.003 | ||||||
Linear trend | 0.413 | 0.192 | 0.032 | 1.511 | 1.036 | 2.202 | |
Quadratic trend | −0.364 | 0.214 | 0.088 | 0.695 | 0.457 | 1.056 | |
Cubic trend | −0.113 | 0.233 | 0.627 | 0.893 | 0.566 | 1.410 | |
Brought up in religion | 0.064 | ||||||
Catholic vs. Atheist | 0.028 | 0.131 | 0.832 | 1.028 | 0.796 | 1.328 | |
Muslim vs. Atheist | −0.771 | 0.300 | 0.010 | 0.463 | 0.257 | 0.833 | |
Other vs. Atheist | −0.159 | 0.274 | 0.562 | 0.853 | 0.498 | 1.460 | |
Sexual interest/Internet behavior | Yes vs. No | 0.747 | 0.139 | <0.001 | 2.112 | 1.608 | 2.773 |
Age (years-old) | 0.252 | 0.053 | <0.001 | 1.287 | 1.159 | 1.429 |
H-L: Hosmer–Lemeshow. N-R2: Nagelkerke’s pseudo-R2 coefficient. AUC: Area under the ROC curve. B: Logistic parameter. SE: Standard error. OR: odds ratio.