Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 16;17(22):8467. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228467

Table 2.

Hierarchical regression analyses: Effects of individual background and gratitude variables on subjective well-being (male group; n = 292).

Variables Subjective Well-Being
SWLS Hope PA NA
Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2
Individual backgrounds
Age −0.008 −0.078 −0.034 −0.090 0.079 0.099 −0.363 *** −0.333 ***
Education 0.088 0.073 0.114 0.084 0.096 0.083 −0.139 * −0.153 *
Economic status 0.138 * 0.097 0.071 0.012 0.017 0.004 0.043 0.033
Religion (Yes = 1) 0.125 0.026 0.070 −0.031 0.132 * 0.122 0.013 0.014
Gratitude
GQ-6 0.481 *** 0.550 *** 0.146 * 0.111
GAC 0.227 *** 0.121 * −0.173 ** −0.224 ***
F (df) 3.037 (4) 25.063 (5) 1.601 (4) 24.857 (5) 3.598 (4) 4.218 (5) 15.405 (4) 13.517 (5)
R2 (ΔR2) 0.045 (0.030) 0.368 (0.354) 0.023 (0.009) 0.356 (0.342) 0.052 (0.037) 0.088 (0.067) 0.189 (0.177) 0.236 (0.219)

* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. β = Standardized coefficient. Model 1 contained individual background variables; Model 2 contained individual background and gratitude variables.