Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 17;13(22):5196. doi: 10.3390/ma13225196

Table 1.

A summary of MP purification techniques.

MP Purification Technologies MPs Used Size Removal Efficiency Advantages Limitations Ref
Filtration Wastewater,
surface water
100–5000
µm
88.1%
  • Efficient mix of sorption-biological treatment processes

  • Low maintenance costs

  • Simple operation

  • Act as secondary MP sources

  • Disability to treat small-sized MPs

  • Sludge aggregation

  • Mechanical devices

[7]
wastewater 20 μm–4.75 mm 97.2% [6]
PES, PET, PA, PE, PP <5 mm 99.3% [8]
Biological degradation PE 250–1000 μm 43%
  • Simplicity and safety for large-scale use

  • Low operating costs

  • Practically applicable in different environments

  • Flexibility to handle a wide range of wastewater characteristics and flows

  • Aggregation of microbial assemblages on the surface

  • Environmental conditions cannot be easily controlled

  • Difficulty in the analysis of products on a large scale

  • Lack of reproducibility

  • Difficulty in finding the suitable microbial community

[9]
PE, PP, PET, PS 75 μm 1.6–7.4% [10]
Electro
coagulation
PE - >90%
  • No chance of secondary pollution

  • Suitable for the removal of smallest particles

  • Sludge minimization

  • Energy efficiency

  • Cost-effectiveness

  • Flexibility for automation

  • Repeated need for replacing the sacrificial anode, cathode passivation

  • Non-usable in areas without electricity

[15]
Chemical
coagulation
PE <5 mm <90.9%
  • Suitable for the removal of small microparticles

  • Controllable operational conditions

  • Use of simple mechanical devices

  • Addition of chemicals to media

  • Non-usable for large MPs

[43]
PE, PS 180 nm–125 μm <13.6% [52]
PET, PE, PP, PAM 1–100 μm 40.5–54.5% [53]
Extraction PP, PE, PTFE, PET 5–100 µm 67–77%
  • No need for using oil

  • Treatment of large volumes of water

  • Can be used without further infrastructure

  • High speed

  • No report on waste management

  • Can only be used for extracting MPs from binary mixtures

[16]
PS, PE, PET, PVC 10–5000
µm
93% [18]
PS, seawater 100–200 nm 95.5% [54]

MP—microplastic; PES—polyethersulfone, PET—polyethylene terephthalate; PA—polyamide, PE—polyethylene; PP—polypropylene; PS—polystyrene; PAM—polyacrylamide; PTFE—polytetrafluoroethylene, PVC—polyvinyl chloride.