Table 1.
MP Purification Technologies | MPs Used | Size | Removal Efficiency | Advantages | Limitations | Ref |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Filtration | Wastewater, surface water |
100–5000 µm |
88.1% |
|
|
[7] |
wastewater | 20 μm–4.75 mm | 97.2% | [6] | |||
PES, PET, PA, PE, PP | <5 mm | 99.3% | [8] | |||
Biological degradation | PE | 250–1000 μm | 43% |
|
|
[9] |
PE, PP, PET, PS | 75 μm | 1.6–7.4% | [10] | |||
Electro coagulation |
PE | - | >90% |
|
|
[15] |
Chemical coagulation |
PE | <5 mm | <90.9% |
|
|
[43] |
PE, PS | 180 nm–125 μm | <13.6% | [52] | |||
PET, PE, PP, PAM | 1–100 μm | 40.5–54.5% | [53] | |||
Extraction | PP, PE, PTFE, PET | 5–100 µm | 67–77% |
|
|
[16] |
PS, PE, PET, PVC | 10–5000 µm |
93% | [18] | |||
PS, seawater | 100–200 nm | 95.5% | [54] |
MP—microplastic; PES—polyethersulfone, PET—polyethylene terephthalate; PA—polyamide, PE—polyethylene; PP—polypropylene; PS—polystyrene; PAM—polyacrylamide; PTFE—polytetrafluoroethylene, PVC—polyvinyl chloride.