Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 17;13(11):400. doi: 10.3390/ph13110400

Table 2.

Consensus on drivers and risks to biosimilar market sustainability (competition and incentives).

  • I. 

    Competition is a more effective mechanism to achieve a long-term predictable price level than regulation

Increased competition leads to more rapid price reduction and, if procurement policies contribute to business continuity, a sustained lower price level graphic file with name pharmaceuticals-13-00400-i012.jpg
There is a need to develop better prospective indicators to warn about potential risk of de facto monopoly graphic file with name pharmaceuticals-13-00400-i013.jpg
  • Existing indicators, such as the number of manufacturers and manufacturing sites for biosimilars, are imperfect and may only indicate a problem that is too late to reverse

  • Additional indicators that could be explored include procurement design (e.g., contract length), geographic division (national vs. regional) and factors other than cost

graphic file with name pharmaceuticals-13-00400-i014.jpg
New entrants may bring minor improvements (e.g., administration devices), although competition has been primarily price-focused and has led to a reduction in “value-add” (e.g., patient support programs) graphic file with name pharmaceuticals-13-00400-i015.jpg
Price-setting regulation, if needed to prevent predatory behaviour, should not aim primarily at the lowest possible prices but at long-term viability of a vibrant and competitive marketplace graphic file with name pharmaceuticals-13-00400-i016.jpg
  • II. 

    There needs to be incentives for investment in future biosimilars

Continued investment in biosimilar development and market entry is important to generate competition for biological therapies for which no biosimilar is currently available and, to a lesser extent, therapies with biosimilars already available graphic file with name pharmaceuticals-13-00400-i017.jpg
Price expectations of policy and budget holders must reflect market opportunity, e.g., biosimilars of orphan therapies may require lower price discount levels graphic file with name pharmaceuticals-13-00400-i018.jpg
A stable, predictable price level enables manufacturers to make the long-term decisions that are required to invest in biosimilar development graphic file with name pharmaceuticals-13-00400-i019.jpg
  • III. 

    Governments and pricing bodies need to drive incentives

These bodies need to supply incentives that enable enough suppliers to survive free market onslaught; this may assure the continuity of long-term competition and sustainable discounts from originator biological therapy price levels graphic file with name pharmaceuticals-13-00400-i020.jpg
  • This could be achieved by varying tender available to manufacturers

graphic file with name pharmaceuticals-13-00400-i021.jpg

Note: icons shown on the right represent level of agreement between the stakeholders. The ‘consensus’ icon indicates that all stakeholders (physicians, payers, policy advisors, manufacturers, pharmacists, and patients) agreed on that point.