Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 18;10(1):24–48. doi: 10.1089/wound.2020.1175

Table 1.

Comparison of different adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cell isolation methods

Article Isolation Method Cell Concentration (Number/mL) AD-MSCs (% of total cells) Comments
Zuk et al.32 Enzymatic (gold standard) 4,000,000 14.3 AD-MSCs per gram of AT collagenase ± dispase
Baptista et al.44 Mechanical 240,000 5 PBS washing + centrifugation at 900 g for 15 min
Baptista et al.44; Mechanical 25,000 NA Erythrocyte lysis 15 min + centrifugation at 1200 g for 10 min
Battah et al.45
Shah et al.46 Mechanical 480,000 5.2 PBS washing under agitation during 1–2 min + centrifugation at 1200 g for 5 min
Tonnard et al.47 Mechanical (nanofat grafting) [19,000–20,000] 5.1 30 inter-syringe passages + filtration at 500 μM
Raposio et al.48 Mechanical (vortexing) 125,000 5 PBS washing + vortex 600 vibrations/min + centrifugation at 1600 rpm for 6 min
Condé-Green et al.49 Mechanical [11,500–23,000] [6–13] High-speed centrifugation + vortex for 3 min + conventional centrifugation
Markarian et al.50 Mechanical 15,000 NA Centrifugation at 800 g or 1280 g for 15 min
Mechanical [40,000–50,000] [1.4–12.8] Different tryspin concentration + lower centrifugation at 600 g for 10 min
Mashiko et al.51 Mechanical (micronizing) [700,000–800,000] 20 Passing throw rotating blade device centrifugation at 2300 g for 5 min squeeze vs. emulsifaction47

AD-MSC, adipose derived-mesenchymal stromal cell; AT, adipose tissue; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; NA, not available.