Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 19;20(22):6637. doi: 10.3390/s20226637

Table 6.

Biomechanics changes produced by articles that provided feedback based on SF.

ID Parameter of Change SF VD- COP Ankle-Foot Changes Knee Changes Hip Changes Spatiotemporal Changes Comments
[62] SF ↑ 7.5% ↑ 8.6%; R: 8.5% ↓: 9% *;
R: 6.2%
kinematics:
↓Foot at FStrike: 22%, R: 19%
↓ Tibia at Fstrike: 31%;
R 35%
kinematics:
↑ Flex at Fstrike: 25%;
R 32%.
kinetics:
CKF: ↓ 7.6–10.61%
R: 4.5–8.24%.
Step length: ↓ 8.36%; R: 8.2% * COP distance from body COM at FStrike
[72] SF ↑ 7.5% ↑ 8.6%;
R ↑ 8.5%
kinetics:
VALR; 19%; R: 20%;
VILR: 18%; R: 17.5%
kinetics:
Abs↓ 27.27% R: ↓ 21.21%;
Abs/km ↓ 21.1%, R: ↓ 14%
kinematics:
Add ↓ 27%;
R: ↓ 21%
[75] SF ↑ 10% and loading FS ↑ 10% COP foot position: Moved forward
SF: 6%;
SF and Visual FB: 37.31%;
SF and Auditory FB: 45.35%
Combined: 45.51%
kinetics:
Area loaded: midfoot ↓ 40%, heel ↓ 80%, forefoot ↑ 10–36%; great toe ↑ 30%
[74] SF
(↑ 10%, 20%, ↓ 10%, ↓ 20)
& head trajectory
↑ 10–20% kinetics:
Tibia shock attenuation:
SF + 20 = ↑ 12%; SF + 10 = ↑ 5%
peak impact acceleration ↓ 1.9%
Significant changes across all SF conditions. Larger impact on Tibia with SF-20. Changes reported in this table: +20, +10. Feedback was not significantly correlated with variables.
[76] SF ↓ 0–10%;
VD: ↓ 10–20% and P ↓ 10–20%
↑ up 7% and ↓ 10% * ↓ 20% and ↑ 5% * Trend value. Not significant

Definitions: Decreased (↓), increased (↑), foot strike (FStrike); absorption (Abs); adduction (add); 1-month retention (R); run power (P); step frequency (SF); feedback (FB). (*) details about a value in comments.