Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 19;12(11):3443. doi: 10.3390/cancers12113443

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Phenotype, acquisition of TKIs resistance and changes in the principal biological processes of KU812 ImaR cells when compared with KU812 Parental cells. (A) Graphical description of the generation of an imatinib-resistant KU812 cell model (KU812 ImaR) under normoxia (Norm) by exposure of imatinib increasing concentrations. (B) Representative experiment (mean ± SD for n = 3 of n = 2 independent experiments) of the effect of three different clinically-relevant tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) on the cell viability of KU812 Parental and ImaR cell. Cells were incubated for 72 h with DMSO (vehicle control) or increasing concentrations of the corresponding inhibitor. Viability of the cells at each concentration was analyzed, and the half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) was determined. (C) Growth curve of KU812 parental and KU812 ImaR cells under normoxia and hypoxia (Hyp). The data represent mean ± SD for n = 3 of n = 2 independent experiments. Statistically significant differences were determined by two-tailed independent sample Welch’s t-test between KU812 ImaR and KU812 Parental in hypoxia (b), KU812 Parental in normoxia vs. hypoxia (c), or KU812 ImaR in normoxia vs. hypoxia (d) (p < 0.05 (b, c), p < 0.01 (bb, cc or dd), p < 0.001 (ccc). (D) Cell volume of KU812 P and KU812 ImaR cells under normoxia measured with the ScepterTM Handheld Automated Cell Counter. Statistically significant differences in all the panels was determined by two-tailed independent sample Student’s t-tests: *** p < 0.001.