Table 4.
Path | b |
---|---|
Hypothesis 1: Autonomy-supportive coaching → athlete burnout | −0.21 * |
Hypothesis 2: Autonomy-supportive coaching → communication | 0.48 * |
Hypothesis 3: Autonomy-supportive coaching → coach–athlete relationship | 0.75 * |
Hypothesis 4: Controlling coaching → athlete burnout | 0.38 * |
Hypothesis 5: Controlling coaching → communication | −0.12 * |
Hypothesis 6: Controlling coaching → coach–athlete relationship | −0.03 |
Hypothesis 7: Communication → athlete burnout | −0.13 * |
Hypothesis 8: Communication → coach–athlete relationship | 0.14 * |
Hypothesis 9: Coach–athlete relationship → athlete burnout | −0.21 * |
* p < 0.05, b = standardized regression weight.