Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 20;17(22):8618. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228618

Table 4.

Path coefficients between Latent Variables.

Path b
Hypothesis 1: Autonomy-supportive coaching → athlete burnout −0.21 *
Hypothesis 2: Autonomy-supportive coaching → communication 0.48 *
Hypothesis 3: Autonomy-supportive coaching → coach–athlete relationship 0.75 *
Hypothesis 4: Controlling coaching → athlete burnout 0.38 *
Hypothesis 5: Controlling coaching → communication −0.12 *
Hypothesis 6: Controlling coaching → coach–athlete relationship −0.03
Hypothesis 7: Communication → athlete burnout −0.13 *
Hypothesis 8: Communication → coach–athlete relationship 0.14 *
Hypothesis 9: Coach–athlete relationship → athlete burnout −0.21 *

* p < 0.05, b = standardized regression weight.