Table 3.
Qualityappraisal.
| n. | Authors | Items of AMSTAR 2 | Overall Rating Quality | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 * | 3 | 4 * | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 * | 10 | 11 * | 12 | 13 * | 14 ** | 15 * | 16 | |||
| 1 | Vanhaecht et al., (2006) [25] | NA | PY | Y | PY | Y | Y | Y | Y | NA | N | NA | NA | NA | Y | Y | N | Low |
| 2 | Lemmens et al., (2008) [26] | NA | PY | Y | PY | Y | Y | Y | Y | NA | Y | NA | NA | NA | Y | Y | PY | Moderate |
| 3 | van Zelm et al., (2018) [27] | NA | PY | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | NA | Y | NA | NA | NA | Y | Y | N | High |
| 4 | Strandberg-Larsen et al., (2009) [28] | NA | PY | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | NA | Y | NA | NA | NA | Y | N | N | Low |
| 5 | Lyngsø et al., (2014) [29] | NA | PY | Y | PY | N | N | PY | PY | NA | N | NA | NA | NA | Y | Y | N | Critically Low |
| 6 | Uijen et al., (2012) [30] | NA | PY | Y | PY | Y | Y | Y | Y | NA | Y | NA | NA | NA | Y | Y | Y | Moderate |
| 7 | Bautista et al., (2016) [31] | NA | PY | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | NA | Y | NA | NA | NA | Y | Y | Y | High |
| 8 | Suter et al., (2017) [32] | NA | PY | Y | PY | Y | Y | Y | Y | NA | Y | NA | NA | NA | Y | Y | Y | Moderate |
| 9 | Valentijn et al., (2019) [33] | NA | PY | Y | Y | Y | Y | PY | Y | NA | Y | NA | NA | NA | Y | Y | Y | High |
Note: * Critical items ** Heterogeneity related by comparing the results of each of the studies included. NA: not applicable. PY: Partial Yes. Y: Yes. N: Not.