Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 23;21(22):8877. doi: 10.3390/ijms21228877

Table 3.

Studies of pathways hindering cGAS–STING activation of interferon signaling after ionizing radiation.

Ref Radiation Dose Cells/Model Cell Type Responses
[101] 20 Gy b
8 Gy b
TSA in vivo (s.c.) a
TSA in vitro
mouse mammary carcinoma e efficacy with cellular CASP3-deficiency
↑ type I IFN a with cellular CASP3-deficiency
[22] 40 Gy
15 Gy
MC38 in vitro
MC38 in vivo (s.c.)
mouse colon adenocarcinoma ↑ type I IFN with CASP9-deficiency
↑ efficacy with CASP9-deficiency
[102] 20 Gy MC38 in vivo (s.c) mouse colon adenocarcinoma ↑ efficacy, ↑ type I IFN, and ↑ DC priming capacity with host non-canonical NF-κB-deficiency
[25] 8 Gy b × 3 a + αCTLA4
8 Gy b × 3
TSA in vivo (s.c.)
TSA in vitro
mouse mammary carcinoma d systemic (abscopal) efficacy with induction of cellular Trex1
↓ type I IFN with induction of cellular Trex1
[27] 8 Gy b × 3 TSA in vitro mouse mammary carcinoma ↓ dsDNA a cargo in exosomes with induction of cellular Trex1

a Abbreviations: double-stranded DNA (dsDNA); interferon (IFN); subcutaneous (s.c.); 3 doses (× 3). b External beam X-ray irradiator. d Decreased. e Increased.