Table 1.
Summary of results.
| Strong linear correlation (R = 0.92) between MCS and number of MU | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Range of dose differences at the longitudinal edges | Superior Edge | Inferior Edge | |
| Dynamic Delivery @ 2 cm | [−4.06% −22.42%] | [6.96% −14.02%] | |
| Dynamic Delivery @ 1 cm | No Trend | ||
| Relative dose at the longitudinal edges (Rx = 1000 cGy) | |||
| All amplitudes | GTV | 1137 cGy–1366 cGy | |
| ITV | 1054 cGy–1263 cGy | ||
| PTV @ 1 cm | 934 cGy–1131 cGy | ||
| PTV @ 2 cm | 826cGy–1163 cGy | ||
| Gamma Analysis | |||
| Complexity ↑, Gamma Passing Rate ↓ | |||
| Dynamic < Static | |||
| 2 cm Motion Had Lowest Gamma Passing Rates | |||