Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 10;13:100732. doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2020.100732

Table 1.

Characteristics of the included studies.

Study Study design Study population Mean age No. of cases No. of controls PPI use Outcome
Ozdil et al. (2013) Prospective cohort Males & females 37.7 ± 8.8 114 110 PPI doses & type: Lansoprazole 30 mg/day, Pantoprazole 40 mg/day, or Esomeprazole 40 mg/day.The duration was 8.5 ± 2.3 months PPI results in a statistically significant reduction in BMD of the vertebra and femur.
Gray et al. (2010) Prospective cohort Females PPI users 64.8 ± 7.1,
PPI non-users 63.1 ± 7.3
3396 148,394 PPI classes include: Omeprazole, Esomeprazole, Lansoprazole, Pantoprazole, Rabeprazole. The duration (<1Y, 1–3Y, >3Y) PPI use was associated with only a marginal effect on 3-year BMD change at the hip but not at other site & this association was not present in longer follow up 6 years
Elaine et al. (2008) Prospective cohort Females 79.3 234 4574 The type and dose of PPI were not recorded. The average follows up 4.6 years. No significant BMD differences were observed
Solomon et al. (2015) Prospective cohort Females PPI users 50.7 ± 4.2,
PPI non-users 50.2 ± 3.9
207 1605 The PPI type, dose was not recorded. The duration was 9.9 years. No difference in the adjusted model in the annualized BMD change at the lumbar spine, femoral neck or total hip in the PPI users compared with non-users.
Bahtiri et al. (2016) Prospective cohort Males & females 50.59 ± 10.61 167 42 PPI doses & type: Omeprazole at 20 mg/day, Esomeprazole at 20 mg/day, Lansoprazole at 30 mg/day, and Pantoprazole at 40 mg/day. The duration was 1 year PPI treatment for 12 months resulted in lower femur neck & total hip BMD T scores
Roux et al. (2012) Prospective cohort Females PPI users 65.9 ± 6.3, PPI non-users 65.8 ± 6.6 61 1150 Omeprazole recorded as a type and no dose recorded. The duration 6 years Patient using omeprazole had lower lumbar spine and hip BMD T scores at baseline but after follow up there was no difference in hip BMD between users & non-users
Targownik et al. (2012) Prospective cohort Males & females Y0 61.0 ± 13.0, Y5 59.9 ± 12.1, Y10 58.0 ± 11.6 228 8112 The dose & indication for PPI use were not recorded followed after baseline at 5 years and 10 years PPI users had lower BMD at baseline than PPI non-users, but PPI use over 10 years did not appear to be associated with accelerated BMD loss
Targownik et al. (2017) Prospective cohort Males & females PPI users 65.1 ± 9.1,
PPI non-users 64.9 ± 7.9
52 52 The dose & type of PPI were not recorded. The duration was 5 years Long term PPI use is not associated with any changes in BMD or bone strength that would predispose to an increased risk of fracture.
Shin et al. (2019) Retrospective cohort Females 64.3 ± 10.4 223 223 The dose & type of PPI were not recorded. Exposure to PPI was 30 D, 31–90 Ds, >90 Ds. Total hip BMD was significantly lower in the PPI exposure groups regardless of the exposure timing. However, the association of BMD with the PPI exposure timing was inconsistent for the lumbar or femoral neck
Xuan et al. (2014) Retrospective cohort Males & females 63 ± 10 79 47 The dose & type of PPI were not recorded. The duration was less than one year Long term use of PPI is associated with decrease in hip joint BMD.