Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 24;67(7):823–839. doi: 10.1111/zph.12767

Table 2.

Pathogens detected from questing Ixodes ricinus nymphs in Helsinki and associated prevalence (%) and its binomial 95% confidence interval

Pathogen Positive samples Prevalence ±95 CI
Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato 319 23.0 20.1–25.3
B. afzelii 193 14.0 12.2–15.9
B. garinii 67 4.8 3.8–6.1
B. burgdorferi sensu stricto 35 2.5 1.8–3.5
B. valaisiana 36 2.6 1.8–3.6
Unidentified Borrelia 11 0.8 0.4–1.4
Borrelia miyamotoi 10 0.7 0.4–1.3
Rickettsia 109 7.9 6.5–9.4
R. helvetica 104 7.5 6.2–9.0
R. monacensis 5 0.4 0.1–0.8
Babesia 5 0.4 0.1–0.8
B. venatorum 3 0.2 0.0–0.6
B. capreoli 1 0.1 0.0–0.4
Neoehrlichia mikurensis 34 2.5 1.7–3.4
Anaplasma phagocytophilum 15 1.1 0.6–1.8
Tick‐borne encephalitis virus 0 0
Any pathogen 437 31.5 29.1–34.1

Number of analysed samples for each pathogen was 1,386. Note that the number of Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. positive samples differs from the sum of all genospecies and unidentified Borrelia due to coinfections.