Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 12;90(12):1004–1018. doi: 10.1111/josh.12968

Table 3.

Results of 2‐Level General Linear Models to Examine for Pre‐ to Post‐test Differences for Participants (N = 133)

Model 1 Model 2
Time (pre = 0) Grade 8 Time Main Effect (Pre = 0) Race Main Effect (White = 0) Race*Time Interaction Grade 8 Scores
Outcomes β SE p β SE p β SE p β SE p β SE p β SE p
Student‐teacher relationships
Positive relationships −0.06 .07 .37 −0.02 .08 .82 −0.23 .16 .17 0.08 .14 .56
Motivation
Amotivation1 −0.09 .11 .40    0.08 .09 .34     0.45 .25 .07 −0.47 .25 .05
External reg. −0.02 .15 .91 −0.20 .19 .30    0.16 .28 .58 0.52 .29 .08
Introjected reg.   0.20 .17 .23   0.22 .20 .26    0.42 .31 .16 −0.02 .33 .96
Identified reg.   0.01 .13 .96 −0.15 .17 .38    0.30 .23 .21 0.39 .24 .10
Intrinsic mot. −0.03 .14 .81 −0.17 .16 .27 −0.01 .28 .99 0.40 .28 .16
School membership
Belongingness    0.27 .04 <.001     0.23 .04 <.001 −0.11 .10 .27 0.13 .06 .02
Student behavior
Prosocial beh.    0.07 .04 .07    0.01 .04 .78 −0.20 .08 .01 0.06 .07 .41
Problem beh.1 −0.07 .02 <.001    −0.05 .02 .01    0.04 .05 .38 −0.06 .04 .09
Academic indicators
Excused absences    1.02 .22 <.001 .35 .04 <.001     0.99 .32     .002 −0.73 .28 .01 0.12 .39 .77 .30 .05 <.001
Unexcused absences   2.43 .28 <.001 .45 .10 <.001     2.75 .39 <.001 −0.19 .29 .51 −0.37 .49 .45 .42 .12 <.001
GPA −0.03 .02 .22 .80 .07 <.001 −0.06 .03 .07   0.03 .05 .57 0.09 .04 .04 .78 .08 <.001
Earned credits    0.05 .05 .32 .15 .71 .83   0.04 .05 .48     0.13 .06 .03 0.04 .11 .71 .07 .10 .51

Note. 1indicates negatively valanced program outcomes, where decreases from pre‐ to post‐ test are expected.

Reg = regulation, Mot = motivation, Beh = behavior.

Bolded font represent significant or marginal (p < .10) pre‐post differences.