Table 2.

Potential candidate lethal alleles identified with recessive transmission ratio distortion patterns by the genotypic model

Chr 1	Region (Kbp)	SNP 2	Hetero sires 3	Hetero dams 4	Frequency (%)	AB 5  × AA		AB × BB		AB × AB			TRD effects 7
						AA 6	AB	AB	BB	AA	AB	BB	α g	δ g
1	27 680–27 924	10	24	101	2.51	0	0	450	447	0	17	10	−0.58	0.29
1	29 253–29 484	10	30	108	4.33	0	0	305	265	0	20	11	−0.54	0.35
2	40 083–40 199	4	13	86	1.83	0	0	336	481	0	23	15	−0.77	0.14
3	29 955–30 188	10	5	39	0.67	0	0	106	142	0	15	10	−0.71	0.16
4	60 400–60 941	20	9	64	1.93	0	0	252	321	0	32	16	−0.72	0.21
4	65 823–65 908	4	10	48	0.91	0	0	153	232	0	20	11	−0.77	0.11
5	3900–3975	4	50	170	4.92	0	0	950	967	0	26	17	−0.62	0.30
6	8973–9097	10	19	81	2.48	0	0	431	458	0	21	11	−0.63	0.27
11	23 084–23 137	4	31	107	3.04	0	0	573	673	0	22	12	−0.67	0.23
12	15 689–15 829	20	9	49	1.84	0	0	285	304	0	15	10	−0.61	0.26
19	4054–4196	20	43	156	4.39	0	0	763	756	0	62	18	−0.63	0.33
21	9664–9680	4	38	129	3.03	0	0	525	573	0	52	22	−0.67	0.29
24	672–742	10	13	54	1.86	0	0	323	384	0	17	10	−0.66	0.22
28	1640–1794	20	20	107	2.96	0	0	484	476	0	15	10	−0.57	0.29

¹Chromosome.

²Number of SNP on a haplotype window.

³Number of heterozygous sires.

⁴Number of heterozygous dams.

⁵Genotypes of parents.

⁶Genotypes of offspring.

⁷ α _g and δ _g are additive and dominance transmission ratio distortion respectively.