Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 27;477(22):4425–4441. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20200656

Table 1. Comparison of human PFK-M, PFK-L and PFK-P sequences shows weak conservation at Interface 2 residues compared with Interface 1 residues.

PFK-M PFK-L PFK-P
PFK-M Overall identity - 69% 68%
- 780 AA Interface1 - 88% (58/66) 91% (60/66)
- 85.18 kDa Interface 2 - 63% (12/19) 79% (15/19)
ATP site - 88% (7/8) 100% (8/8)
F26BP site 84% (16/19) 95% (18/19)
Allosteric site A - 87% (13/15) 80% (12/15)
Allosteric site B - 88% (15/17) 82% (14/17)
PFK-L Overall identity 69% - 71%
- 780 AA Interface1 88% (58/66) - 89% (59/66)
- 85.02 kDa Interface 2 63% (12/19) - 58% (11/19)
ATP site 88% (7/8) - 88% (7/8)
F26BP site 84% (16/19) - 84% (16/19)
Allosteric site A 87% (13/15) - 67% (10/15)
Allosteric site B 76% (13/17) - 82% (14/17)
PFK-P Overall identity 68% 71% -
- 784 AA Interface1 91% (60/66) 89% (59/66) -
- 85.60 kDa Interface 2 79% (15/19) 58% (11/19) -
ATP site 100% (8/8) 88% (8/8) -
F26BP site 95% (18/19) 84% (16/19) -
Allosteric site A 80% (12/15) 67% (10/15) -
Allosteric site B 82% (14/17) 88% (15/17) -

Residues involved in Interface 1, Interface 2, and binding pockets for ATP and F26BP (Figure 1) were identified using PDBePISA1 using the PFK-P structure (PDB 4XYJ). Allosteric sites A and B (Figure 1) were identified by overlying the structure of EcPFK complex with ADP (PDB PFK1). Supplementary Table S2 compares Interface 1 amino acid sequences; Supplementary Table S3 compares Interface 2 amino acid sequences.