Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 30.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2019 Dec 20;208:116472. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116472

Table 2.

Summary of statistics for performance comparison using ground truth. GLM SS: Conventional GLM with SS regression. GLM tCCA: proposed extension with tCCA. CORR: Correlation, RMSE: Root Mean Square Error, F1: F-Score, ST: Single Trial, AT: Across Trials. Blue: statistically significant improvement offered by the GLM tCCA method.

20% HRF 50% HRF 100% HRF
GLM SS GLM tCCA t-test
p =
GLM SS GLM tCCA t-test
p =
GLM SS GLM tCCA t-test
p =
CORR HbO ST .20 ± .18 .29 ± .20 5e-15 .46 ± .20 .59 ± .18 4e-31 .71 ± .16 .81 ± .12 3e-36
AT .49 ± .36 .51 ± .32 0.21 .80 ± .22 .83 ± 0.15 0.07 .93 ± .10 .95 ± .06 0.14
HbR ST .20 ± .19 .25 ± .22 1e-7 .43 ± .23 .50 ± .24 7e-18 .64 ± .22 .70 ± .21 2e-18
AT .45 ± .36 .43 ± .35 0.28 .73 ± .27 .73 ± .24 0.6 .88 ± .15 .88 ± .14 0.34
RMSE HbO ST 26.6 ± 1.59 17.2 ± 9.2 5e-43 26.6 ± 1.6 17.3 ± 9.2 5e-42 26.8 ± 15.9 17.8 ± 8.6 1e-39
x1e-7 AT 1.5 ± .97 1.3 ± .85 3e-4 1.4 ± .10 1.3 ± .85 5e-3 1.5 ± 1.0 1.3 ± .80 0.13
HbR ST 11.6 ± .85 8.5 ± 6.3 8e-32 11.6 ± .85 8.5 ± 6.3 3e-31 11.6 ± 8.5 9.0 ± 6.3 2e-29
x1e-7 AT .7 ± .6 .65 ± .49 0.60 .66 ± .60 .65 ± .49 .68 .67 ± .59 .68 ± .48 0.55
F1 HbO .12 ± .18 .39 ± .29 2e-5 .52 ± .30 .77 ± .22 6e-5 .88 ± .13 .90 ± .10 0.71
HbR .17 ± .21 .36 ± .24 3e-4 .48 ± .30 .66 ± .23 4e-3 .82 ± .16 .85 ± .11 0.29