Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 18;6(2):83–90. doi: 10.21307/sjcapp-2018-009

TABLE 3.

Screening properties of the BCFPI and the CBCL versus a LEAD diagnosis

  BCFPI CBCL #Diag
Cut* AUC κ Sens Spec PPV NPV AUC κ
ADD 4 0.82 (± 0.05) 0.48 0.80 0.68 0.82 0.65 174
ADHD 7 0.81 (± 0.05) 0.40 0.74 0.68 0.81 0.58 0.80 0.44 174
SAD 9 0.90 (± 0.06) 0.45 0.43 0.97 0.56 0.95 0.74 0.11 23
GAD 11 0.75 (± 0.12) 0.18 0.19 0.97 0.27 0.95 0.72 0.07 16
MDD 7 0.78 (± 0.06) 0.37 0.56 0.81 0.54 0.81 0.77 0.36 80
CD 6 0.83 (± 0.09) 0.19 0.23 0.96 0.23 0.96 0.92 0.34 13
ODD 10 0.73 (± 0.06) 0.31 0.53 0.78 0.56 0.75 0.80 0.43 93
INT 14 0.70 (± 0.06) 0.29 0.62 0.67 0.61 0.68 120
EXT 13 0.78 (± 0.06) 0.34 0.81 0.54 0.82 0.52 193

Note. Figures in parenthesis are 95 % confidence intervals

*

Cut is the cut-off raw score for the kappa analyses

AUC, area under the curve; κ, Kappa; Sen, sensitivity; Spec, specificity; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; #Diag, number of children with a LEAD diagnosis in the spectrum; SAD, separation anxiety disorder; GAD, generalized anxiety disorder; MDD, major depressive disorder; CD, conduct disorder; ODD, oppositional defiant disorder; INT, internalizing symptoms; EXT, externalizing symptoms; ADHD, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder; BCFPI, Brief Child and Family Phone Interview; CBCL, Child Behavior Checklist; LEAD, Longitudinal Expert All Data