Table 4. Correlations of muscle strength parameters with CT acquired muscle parameters.
Knee extensors | Knee extensors | Elbow flexors | Elbow flexors | Hip flexors | Hip flexors | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIPT | MVIC | MIPT | MVIC | MIPT | MVIC | |
MA150 (cm2) | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.82 | 0.85 | 0.62 | 0.57 |
p-value | < .001* | < .001* | < .001* | < .001* | < .001* | < .001* |
n | 53 | 53 | 53 | 53 | 51 | 51 |
SMI150 (cm2/m2) | 0.50 | 0.54 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.45 | 0.40 |
p-value | 0.001* | < .001* | < .001* | < .001* | <0.001** | 0.004* |
n | 53 | 53 | 53 | 53 | 51 | 51 |
MD150 (HU) | 0.23 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.21 |
p-value | 0.099 | 0.292 | 0.211 | 0.191 | 0.158 | 0.136 |
n | 53 | 53 | 53 | 53 | 51 | 51 |
MA100 (cm2) | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.57 | 0.52 |
p-value | < .001* | < .001* | < .001* | < .001* | < .001* | <0.001* |
n | 53 | 53 | 53 | 53 | 51 | 51 |
SMI100 (cm2/m2) | 0.52 | 0.48 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.47 | 0.42 |
p-value | < .001* | <0.001* | < .001* | < .001* | <0.001* | 0.002* |
n | 53 | 53 | 53 | 53 | 51 | 51 |
MD100 (HU) | -0.01 | -0.12 | -0.12 | -0.10 | -0.06 | -0.03 |
p-value | 0.964 | 0.411 | 0.405 | 0.458 | 0.671 | 0.855 |
n | 53 | 53 | 53 | 53 | 51 | 51 |
IMFA (cm2) | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.02 | -0.13 | -0.21 |
p-value | 0.770 | 0.716 | 0.967 | 0.886 | 0.365 | 0.145 |
n | 53 | 53 | 53 | 53 | 51 | 51 |
All patients at baseline (T0), n = 53. Calculation of Spearman correlation coefficients. MIPT: maximal isokinetic peak torque (in Newton Meter); MVIC: maximal voluntary isometric contraction (in Newton); MA = muscle area, SMI = skeletal muscle index, MD = muscle density (in HU), IMFA = inter-muscular-fat area
* = significant
° = strength-measurement of hip flexors could not be performed in n = 2 patients, thus correlation of hip flexion was calculated with n = 51 patient.