Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 30;16(11):e1008425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008425

Fig 1. Illustration of the construction rules of interaction matrices based on theoretical considerations on the optimal pairwise interaction types between genes. e(1) and a(1) are the first embryo-adult pair, e(2) and a(2).

Fig 1

the second pair. Depending on the combination of gene expressions ei(n) and ai(n) in an embryo-adult vector pair (n = 1,2), an mij element of the interaction matrix can be positive (′+′, activation), negative (′−′, inhibition), or undefined (′U′). To ensure correct development (Me(n)e(n)a(n)) the Me(n) matrices must have the structure indicated in the figure. (If ej(n)=1 and ai(n)=1, then mij(n) = ′+′; if ej(n)=1 and ai(n)=0, then mij(n) = ′−′; if ej(n)=0, then mij(n) = ′U′; irrespective of the value of ai(n).) A similar argument holds for the stability criteria (Ma(n)a(n)a(n)) and results in the Ma(n) matrices. By combining Me(n) and Ma(n) the resulting M(n) fulfills both the attractivity and stability criteria. The combination rules are the following: (+,+)→+; (−,−)→−; (±,U)→±; and (±,∓)→C, which can be done practically by taking the element-wise average of the two matrices. The ultimate combination of all M(n)s results in a matrix that fulfills the attraction and stability criteria for all different embryo-adult pairs.