Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 12;27(6):1317–1324. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01787-8

Table 2.

Linear mixed-effect model analyses for character naming and lexical decision

Character naming Lexical decision
Estimate SE T Estimate SE t
Onset features
 Stop -0.028 0.016 -1.731 0.023 0.011 2.165
 Aspirated -0.177 0.019 -9.178 0.006 0.013 0.451
 Voiced -0.083 0.013 -6.185 0.001 0.009 0.088
 Bilabial 0.031 0.021 1.479 -0.005 0.014 -0.373
 Labiodental 0.099 0.029 3.414 0.005 0.019 0.245
 Alveolar 0.068 0.017 4.090 -0.002 0.011 -0.148
 Palatoal-veolar 0.156 0.017 9.330 0.007 0.011 0.628
 Alveolo-palatal 0.178 0.017 10.325 -0.002 0.011 -0.202
Variables
 Log CF -0.110 0.007 -15.477 -0.074 0.006 -15.795
 REG -0.033 0.013 -2.595 -0.005 0.008 -0.600
 UNP -0.030 0.017 -1.688 -0.009 0.011 -0.745
 NS 0.023 0.005 4.183 0.023 0.004 6.158
 CON -0.028 0.007 -4.223 -0.004 0.005 -0.904
 PC 0.005 0.006 0.901 -0.006 0.004 -1.684
 SC 0.011 0.005 2.177 0.008 0.003 2.224
 SAR -0.034 0.007 -5.024 -0.018 0.004 -3.930
 IMG -0.057 0.006 -10.371 -0.030 0.004 -8.174
 AoA 0.030 0.007 4.515 0.025 0.004 5.844
 R2_m 8.94% 5.63%
 R2_c 32.38% 30.18%

Log CF log character frequency, REG regular, UNP unpronounceable, NS number of strokes, CON consistency, PC phonetic combinability, SC semantic combinability, SAR semantic ambiguity rating, IMG imageability, AoA age of acquisition, R2_m marginal R2, R2_c conditional R2

Four lexical-semantic variables are indicated in bold