Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 14.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2020 Oct 14;587(7835):644–649. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2825-4

Extended Data Figure 8. Partitioning SNP heritability for complex disorders and traits using alternative epigenomic annotations.

Extended Data Figure 8.

(a) Forrest plot showing the enrichment of fetal and adult brain eQTL-TSS pairs in our interactions compared to n = 50 sets of distance-matched control interactions (Fisher’s exact test, two-tailed). Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals are shown. The increased significance of adult brain eQTLs can be attributed to the larger sample size of the CommonMind Consortium (CMC) study (n = 1,332,863), while larger odds ratios were observed for the more closely matched fetal brain eQTLs (n = 6,446). (b-c) Histograms displaying the numbers of adult and fetal brain eQTL-TSS pairs recapitulated by n = 50 sets of distance-matched control interactions in each cell type. The numbers of Eqtl-TSS pairs recapitulated by our interactions are indicated by red lines (Fisher’s exact test, two-tailed). (d) LDSC enrichment scores for each disease and cell type, conditioned on the baseline model from Gazal et al. 2017 and stratified by PLAC-seq anchor and target bins. Non-significant enrichment scores are shown as striped bars. (e-f) LDSC enrichment scores for each disease and cell type, conditioned on the baseline model from Gazal et al. 2017 and using either distal open chromatin peaks (e) or cell type-specific genes (f). Non-significant enrichment scores are shown as striped bars.