Skip to main content
. 2020 May 29;23(17):3126–3135. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020000464

Table 3.

Eating behaviours and weight status by household food security status in adolescents, adjusted estimates*

Characteristics Food secure (n 1395) Food insecure (n 890) P
% 95 % CI % 95 % CI
Breakfast (eaten per week)
 Mean 4·3 4·1 0·227
 95 % CI 4·2, 4·5 3·9, 4·4
Lunch (eaten per week)
 Mean 5·9 5·8 0·361
 95 % CI 5·8, 6·0 5·6, 6·0
Dinner (eaten per week)
 Mean 6·0 6·1 0·601
 95 % CI 5·9, 6·2 5·9, 6·3
UWCB (any) 37·8 35·4, 40·2 44·5 39·9, 49·1 0·007
Extreme UWCB 3·2 2·3, 4·5 4·1 3·0, 5·6 0·094
Binge eating 14·0 12·5, 15·6 12·9 11·4, 14·5 0·143
Binge with loss of control 7·5 6·4, 8·7 6·9 5·2, 9·1 0·645
UWCB
 Fasted 10·0 8·4, 11·8 13·4 10·6, 16·9 0·047
 Ate very little food 29·1 27·0, 31·3 32·0 27·7, 36·6 0·184
 Volitional vomiting 1·9 1·3, 3·0 1·5 0·7, 3·2 0·472
 Skipped meals 24·5 22·0, 27·1 28·6 25·3, 32·1 0·075
 Diet pill use 1·2 0·8, 1·8 1·4 0·9, 2·1 0·592
 Laxative use 0·3 0·1, 0·9 0·8 0·3, 2·0 0·005
 Diuretic use
 Food substitute use 6·3 5·3, 7·5 6·8 5·4, 8·5 0·599
 Smoked more cigarettes 1·7 1·0, 2·8 2·0 1·4, 2·9 0·553
Overweight 35·6 32·7, 38·5 37·6 33·4, 42·1 0·391

UWCB, Unhealthy Weight Control Behaviour.

P-values are bolded if statistically significant at the 0·05 significance level.

*

Logistic regression models with robust standard errors were used to estimate marginal probabilities and 95 % CI for each binary outcome variable adjusted for parental education, race/ethnicity, age, sex and potential clustering by school. Similarly adjusted multiple regression models with robust standard errors were used to estimate means and 95 % CI for mean number of breakfast, lunch and dinner outcomes.

Prevalence is too low to estimate result.