Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Drug Policy. 2020 May 29;91:102793. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102793

Table 4.

Relative Importance of 20 Cannabis Attributes: Hierarchical Bayesian Estimation of Mixed Logit Regressions (Full Sample and Subsamples by Cannabis Use Purposes)

Attributes All (N = 817) By Cannabis Use Purposes Recreational Users (N = 266) Medical Users (N = 211) Dual-purpose Users (N = 340)
Mean Std. dev. (std. err.) Share of importance (%) Mean Std. dev. (std. err.) Share of importance (%) Mean Std. dev. (std. err.) Share of importance (%) Mean Std. dev. (std. err.) Share of importance
(%)
Product Characteristics
THC 0 0 9.21 0 0 8.49 0 0 6.04 0 0 13.47
CBD −0.30 (0.07) 1.28 (0.08) 7.31 −0.64 (0.12) 0.85 (0.14) 5.09 0.81 (0.14) 1.65 (0.15) 10.36 −0.80 (0.11) 1.13 (0.13) 7.03
Strain type 0.29 (0.07) 1.32 (0.09) 11.32 0.22 (0.13) 1.21 (0.13) 9.97 0.54 (0.13) 1.10 (0.15) 8.78 0.04 (0.12) 1.14 (0.14) 13.90
Flavor −1.14 (0.07) 1.15 (0.08) 3.54 −0.98 (0.12) 1.29 (0.14) 3.76 −0.79 (0.13) −1.03 (0.16) 3.18 −1.56 (0.12) 1.17 (0.12) 3.53
Product Quality
Quality 0.57 (0.07) 1.27 (0.08) 13.68 1.09 (0.14) 1.57 (0.15) 16.90 0.67 (0.14) 1.02 (0.18) 9.52 0.22 (0.12) 1.31 (0.13) 15.75
Origin −0.98 (0.07) −0.98 (0.08) 4.10 −0.83 (0.12) −1.02 (0.14) 4.32 −0.39 (0.13) −1.20 (0.16) 4.46 −1.66 (0.11) 0.94 (0.13) 3.21
Pesticide −0.07 (0.07) 1.32 (0.08) 8.76 −0.03 (0.12) 1.29 (0.14) 8.33 0.68 (0.13) 1.24 (0.16) 9.60 −0.65 (0.11) 1.50 (0.14) 8.00
Lab test −1.22 (0.07) 0.95 (0.08) 3.32 −1.11 (0.12) 1.03 (0.14) 3.37 −0.44 (0.13) 0.97 (0.15) 4.28 −1.88 (0.11) 1.01 (0.13) 2.62
Package Characteristics
Label instruction −2.09 (0.07) 1.34 (0.08) 1.46 −2.05 (0.13) 1.53 (0.13) 1.40 −1.11 (0.14) 1.05 (0.14) 2.40 −2.85 (0.12) 1.29 (0.13) 1.02
Label warning −1.90 (0.07) 1.17 (0.08) 1.75 −1.85 (0.13) 1.34 (0.17) 1.68 −0.83 (0.13) 1.31 (0.16) 3.08 −2.67 (0.12) 1.04 (0.13) 1.21
Date of harvest −1.20 (0.07) −0.57 (0.10) 3.37 −1.14 (0.12) −0.60 (0.15) 3.27 −0.62 (0.13) 0.47 (0.18) 3.69 −1.72 (0.14) −0.73 (0.13) 3.03
Package −2.37 (0.07) 1.33 (0.08) 1.11 −2.36 (0.13) 1.06 (0.14) 1.04 −1.48 (0.13) 1.25 (0.14) 1.71 −3.07 (0.12) 1.24 (0.11) 0.82
Price and Free Sample
Price 0.21 (0.08) 1.83 (0.09) 10.77 0.30 (0.12) 1.31 (0.14) 10.54 0.53 (0.14) 1.65 (0.17) 8.72 −0.29 (0.12) 2.09 (0.14) 10.75
Free Sample −1.74 (0.07) 1.66 (0.08) 2.04 −1.47 (0.13) 1.91 (0.16) 2.41 −1.17 (0.14) 1.59 (0.16) 2.26 -2.38 (0.12) 1.83 (0.14) 1.61
Store Characteristics
Compliance to law −0.87 (0.07) 1.63 (0.08) 4.52 −0.67 (0.13) 1.94 (0.16) 4.96 0.05 (0.13) 1.80 (0.16) 6.28 −1.85 (0.12) 1.67 (0.13) 2.68
Staff −0.86 (0.07) 1.07 (0.08) 4.54 −0.80 (0.12) 1.12 (0.14) 4.44 −0.19 (0.13) 1.37 (0.16) 5.23 −1.43 (0.11) −0.91 (0.13) 3.97
Distance −1.38 (0.07) 1.37 (0.08) 2.85 −1.11 (0.12) 1.21 (0.14) 3.37 −0.77 (0.12) 0.92 (0.16) 3.24 −1.99 (0.12) 1.48 (0.13) 2.35
Store hours −1.94 (0.07) 1.19 (0.08) 1.69 −2.07 (0.125) 1.32 (0.13) 1.37 −1.32 (0.13) 0.90 (0.15) 1.98 −2.45 (0.12) 0.96 (0.12) 1.51
Restrictions on Use
Public use −1.78 (0.07) 1.51 (0.09) 1.97 −1.69 (0.13) 1.64 (0.15) 1.97 −1.25 (0.14) 1.39 (0.17) 2.11 −2.37 (0.12) 1.82 (0.14) 1.62
Employer −1.45 (0.07) 1.82 (0.08) 2.68 −1.13 (0.12) 2.00 (0.15) 3.32 −0.82 (0.14) 1.74 (0.17) 3.09 −2.19 (0.12) 1.88 (0.14) 1.93

Notes:

The share of importance was calculated with formula exp(mean)exp(mean+a-1)×b, where a was the number of attributes shown per BWS task (in this study it was 4), “mean” was the coefficient mean of each attribute in hierarchical Bayesian estimation of mixed logit regressions, and b is a constant to make the sum of the share of importance to be 100.