Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 20.
Published in final edited form as: Free Radic Biol Med. 2020 Aug 28;160:418–432. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.08.016

Figure 8. GCLC protein responses to an acute exercise bout before and after eight weeks of ET or CON.

Figure 8.

Open circles indicate pre-intervention GCLC protein responses to acute exercise, while black squares indicate post-intervention responses. (A) Representative blots of GCLC with β-Actin used as an internal control for ET and CON groups pre- and post-intervention respectively. (B) GCLC shows an increase in the steady state concentrations after exercise training compared to pre-intervention in trained subjects. (C) GCLC protein responses were not different after the inactive control intervention. There was a significant interaction between the GCLC protein response and the change in baseline GCLC protein content (p = 0.016). There were no significant differences between young and older individuals or by sex in response to the training. Data shown as Mean ± SEM.