Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 14;99(12):7159–7168. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.08.060

Table 2.

The CCD-RSM design for optimizing hydrolysis conditions.

Run number Code level of variables
Response value Y (%) Type of point
x1 (X1) x2 (X2) x3 (X3) x4 (X4)
1 60 (−1) 8.5 (−1) 5 (−1) 0.2 (−1) 37.36 Factorial
2 70 (+1) 8.5 (−1) 5 (−1) 0.2 (−1) 47.63 Factorial
3 60 (−1) 10.5 (+1) 5 (−1) 0.2 (−1) 50.8 Factorial
4 70 (+1) 10.5 (+1) 5 (−1) 0.2 (−1) 45.02 Factorial
5 60 (−1) 8.5 (−1) 6 (+1) 0.2 (−1) 39.69 Factorial
6 70 (+1) 8.5 (−1) 6 (+1) 0.2 (−1) 52.62 Factorial
7 60 (−1) 10.5 (+1) 6 (+1) 0.2 (−1) 59.69 Factorial
8 70 (+1) 10.5 (+1) 6 (+1) 0.2 (−1) 56.66 Factorial
9 60 (−1) 8.5 (−1) 5 (−1) 0.4 (+1) 38.53 Factorial
10 70 (+1) 8.5 (−1) 5 (−1) 0.4 (+1) 49.46 Factorial
11 60 (−1) 10.5 (+1) 5 (−1) 0.4 (+1) 56.26 Factorial
12 70 (+1) 10.5 (+1) 5 (−1) 0.4 (+1) 49.67 Factorial
13 60 (−1) 8.5 (−1) 6 (+1) 0.4 (+1) 38.46 Factorial
14 70 (+1) 8.5 (−1) 6 (+1) 0.4 (+1) 53.75 Factorial
15 60 (−1) 10.5 (+1) 6 (+1) 0.4 (+1) 59.28 Factorial
16 70 (+1) 10.5 (+1) 6 (+1) 0.4 (+1) 57.08 Factorial
17 55 (−α) 9.5 (0) 5.5 (0) 0.3 (0) 44.29 Axial
18 75 (+α) 9.5 (0) 5.5 (0) 0.3 (0) 52.25 Axial
19 65 (0) 7.5 (−α) 5.5 (0) 0.3 (0) 31.84 Axial
20 65 (0) 11.5 (+α) 5.5 (0) 0.3 (0) 51.58 Axial
21 65 (0) 9.5 (0) 4.5 (−α) 0.3 (0) 50.13 Axial
22 65 (0) 9.5 (0) 6.5 (+α) 0.3 (0) 62.15 Axial
23 65 (0) 9.5 (0) 5.5 (0) 0.1 (−α) 50.77 Axial
24 65 (0) 9.5 (0) 5.5 (0) 0.5 (+α) 53.68 Axial
25 65 (0) 9.5 (0) 5.5 (0) 0.3 (0) 62.05 Center
26 65 (0) 9.5 (0) 5.5 (0) 0.3 (0) 62.65 Center
27 65 (0) 9.5 (0) 5.5 (0) 0.3 (0) 63.33 Center
28 65 (0) 9.5 (0) 5.5 (0) 0.3 (0) 61.65 Center
29 65 (0) 9.5 (0) 5.5 (0) 0.3 (0) 63.78 Center
30 65 (0) 9.5 (0) 5.5 (0) 0.3 (0) 62.65 Center

Abbreviations: CCD, central composite design; RSM, response surface methodology; x, the actual level of variables; X, the code level of variables.