Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Jun 1;44(2):253–260. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1765031

Table 2.

Community participation of youth with and without craniofacial microsomia (CFM)

Youth with CFM versus youth without CFM receiving services Youth with CFM versus youth without CFM not receiving services
Variables b /exp (b) (95%CI) ES (95% CI) b /exp (b) (95%CI) ES (95% CI)
Participation frequency −0.18 (−0.43, 0.07) −0.20 (−0.46, 0.07) −0.49** (−0.73, −0.25) −0.52 (−0.78, −0.26)
Desire for change in community participation § 1.03 (0.90, 1.17) 1.35 **(1.17, 1.54)
Environmental support in community participation −1.60 (−4.15, 0.95) −0.17 (−0.43, 0.10) −2.32 (−4.81, 0.18) −0.24 (−0.50, 0.02)
Youth with CFM Youth without CFM receiving services Youth without CFM not receiving services
Mdn (Q1, Q3) Mdn (Q1, Q3) Mdn (Q1, Q3)
Involvement in community-based activities 4.32 (3.76, 4.78) 4.38 (3.71, 4.80) 4.57 (4.10, 4.90)*

Note. CFM = Craniofacial microsomia; b=Beta; ES = Effect size; CI = Confidence interval; Mdn = Median; Q1 = First quartile; Q3 = Third quartile

† =

Adjusted for youth gender, youth age, youth race/ethnicity, caregiver age, caregiver education, annual income, and marital status.

• =

Calculated using multiple linear regression

‡ =

Significance testing using Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney test was done between youth with CFM and each of the groups of youth without CFM.

§ =

Calculated using Poisson regression; exponential beta reported (exp (B))

*=

p < 0.05

** =

p < 0.001