Table 2.
Community participation of youth with and without craniofacial microsomia (CFM)
| Youth with CFM versus youth without CFM receiving services | Youth with CFM versus youth without CFM not receiving services | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | b /exp (b) (95%CI) | ES (95% CI) | b /exp (b) (95%CI) | ES (95% CI) | |||||
| Participation frequency †• | −0.18 (−0.43, 0.07) | −0.20 (−0.46, 0.07) | −0.49** (−0.73, −0.25) | −0.52 (−0.78, −0.26) | |||||
| Desire for change in community participation †§ | 1.03 (0.90, 1.17) | 1.35 **(1.17, 1.54) | |||||||
| Environmental support in community participation †• | −1.60 (−4.15, 0.95) | −0.17 (−0.43, 0.10) | −2.32 (−4.81, 0.18) | −0.24 (−0.50, 0.02) | |||||
| Youth with CFM | Youth without CFM receiving services | Youth without CFM not receiving services | |||||||
| Mdn (Q1, Q3) | Mdn (Q1, Q3) | Mdn (Q1, Q3) | |||||||
| Involvement in community-based activities ‡ | 4.32 (3.76, 4.78) | 4.38 (3.71, 4.80) | 4.57 (4.10, 4.90)* | ||||||
Note. CFM = Craniofacial microsomia; b=Beta; ES = Effect size; CI = Confidence interval; Mdn = Median; Q1 = First quartile; Q3 = Third quartile
Adjusted for youth gender, youth age, youth race/ethnicity, caregiver age, caregiver education, annual income, and marital status.
Calculated using multiple linear regression
Significance testing using Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney test was done between youth with CFM and each of the groups of youth without CFM.
Calculated using Poisson regression; exponential beta reported (exp (B))
p < 0.05
p < 0.001