Skip to main content
. 2020 May 29;28(2):489–506. doi: 10.1007/s40199-020-00352-x

Table 7.

32 Full factorial design layout and responses noted for NS based gel formulations

Formulation run X1#
(%)
X2#
(%)
R1#
(cP)*
R2#
(%)*
N1 −1 −1 9747 ± 0.22 76.63 ± 1.12
N2 −1 0 9958 ± 0.13 75.24 ± 0.98
N3 −1 +1 10,246 ± 0.18 73.82 ± 0.93
N4 0 −1 11,785 ± 0.23 70.45 ± 1.03
N5 0 0 12,316 ± 0.11 69.32 ± 0.76
N6 0 +1 12,954 ± 0.16 68.51 ± 0.94
N7 +1 −1 13,625 ± 0.27 66.42 ± 0.57
N8 +1 0 14,128 ± 0.21 65.14 ± 0.34
N9 +1 +1 14,934 ± 0.19 63.95 ± 1.07
Factors and their coded levels Low (−1) Medium (0) High (+1)
X1 and X2 0.4 0.5 0.6

#X1- Concentration of gelling agent Carbopol-934; X2- Concentration of guar gum; R1- Viscosity; R2- In vitro drug release, *Mean ± SD, n = 3