Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 12;99(12):7178–7191. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.08.077

Table 7.

Frequency of occurrence of different scores of white striping (WS) in different treatments1,2.

AA density3 Stocking density4 0 score
1 score
2 score
Total birds % Total birds % Total birds %
Norm High 5 27.7 12 66.8 1 5.5
Norm Low 6 33.3 11 61.2 1 5.5
10%Low High 9 50.0 8 44.5 1 5.5
10%Low Low 8 44.3 9 50.2 1 5.5
20%Low High 11 61.2 6 33.2 1 5.7
20%Low Low 10 55.5 7 38.8 1 5.7
SEM 18.6 14.9 7.9
AA density
 Norm 11 30.5 23 64.0 2 5.5
 10%Low 17 47.2 17 47.3 2 5.5
 20%Low 21 58.3 13 36.0 2 5.7
 SEM 12.6 12.7 5.3
Stocking density
 High 25 46.3 26 48.2 3 5.6
 Low 24 44.4 27 50.1 3 5.6
 SEM 7.2 8.2 3.01
P values
 AA density 0.084 0.086 0.999
 Stocking density 0.863 0.864 0.999
 AA density × stocking density 0.481 0.463 0.999
 AA density linear 0.043 0.044 0.976
 AA density quadratic 0.811 0.819 0.986
1

Means represent 6 replicates with 3 randomly selected birds per replicate and 18 birds per treatment.

2

Score 0 = normal (no white striping), score 1 = moderate WS (white lines < 1-mm thick), score 2 = severe WS (white lines > 1-mm thick).

3

Norm = recommended amino acid (AA) density; 10%low = 10% lower than norm AA density; 20%low = 20% lower than norm AA density.

4

High = 35 kg of body weight/m2; low = 26 kg of body weight/m2 of stocking density.