Table 5.
Storage time | Natural astaxanthin (mg/kg) | Yolk quality parameter |
Weight loss (%) | Haugh unit | Eggshell strength (N/cm2) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yolk index | Yolk color | Yolk pH | |||||
0 wk | 0 | 0.52a | 10.71f | 6.01 | 0.00 | 83.40 | 41.92 |
20 | 0.51a | 11.68e,f | 6.00 | 0.00 | 83.43 | 40.23 | |
40 | 0.51a | 12.84c,d | 5.99 | 0.00 | 82.88 | 41.92 | |
80 | 0.51a | 14.47a,b | 6.00 | 0.00 | 82.25 | 42.45 | |
160 | 0.51a | 14.89a | 6.00 | 0.00 | 83.34 | 43.17 | |
2 wk | 0 | 0.36b | 9.17g | 6.51 | 0.65 | 52.48 | 41.61 |
20 | 0.38b | 12.17d,e | 6.32 | 0.65 | 59.08 | 42.59 | |
40 | 0.38b | 13.67b,c | 6.33 | 0.58 | 54.93 | 42.08 | |
80 | 0.37b | 14.83a | 6.30 | 0.62 | 52.38 | 41.71 | |
160 | 0.36b | 15.00a | 6.23 | 0.65 | 58.10 | 41.35 | |
4 wk | 0 | 0.25c,d | 10.83f | 6.55 | 6.36 | 34.87 | 41.54 |
20 | 0.26c | 13.00c,d | 6.52 | 6.62 | 36.73 | 41.95 | |
40 | 0.24c,d,e | 14.50a,b | 6.48 | 6.61 | 33.68 | 43.39 | |
80 | 0.24c,d,e | 14.83a | -∗ | 6.89 | 40.07 | 42.13 | |
160 | 0.24c,d,e | 15.00a | -∗ | 6.72 | 37.05 | 40.48 | |
6 wk | 0 | 0.15g,h | -∗ | 6.69 | 11.93 | -∗ | 42.10 |
20 | 0.15g,h | -∗ | 6.82 | 11.50 | -∗ | 42.74 | |
40 | 0.18f,g | -∗ | 6.86 | 11.57 | -∗ | 41.95 | |
80 | 0.20e,f | -∗ | 6.52 | 10.83 | -∗ | 41.62 | |
160 | 0.21d,e,f | -∗ | 6.70 | 11.41 | -∗ | 42.74 | |
8 wk | 0 | 0.14g,h | -∗ | 6.93 | 15.66 | -∗ | 42.56 |
20 | 0.13h | -∗ | 6.76 | 15.12 | -∗ | 41.80 | |
40 | 0.15g,h | -∗ | 6.78 | 15.40 | -∗ | 42.05 | |
80 | 0.15g,h | -∗ | 6.63 | 15.26 | -∗ | 43.52 | |
160 | 0.17f,g,h | -∗ | 6.68 | 15.28 | -∗ | 41.88 | |
Pooled SEM | 0.011 | 0.205 | 0.030 | 0.508 | 2.145 | 0.288 | |
Source of variation | |||||||
P-value | Dietary natural astaxanthin levels | 0.081 | <0.001 | 0.476 | 0.909 | 0.528 | 0.986 |
Storage time | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.981 | |
Dietary natural astaxanthin levels × time | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.443 | 0.944 | 0.536 | 0.996 |
a–hMean values within a column without common superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05).
∗Not determined because the Haugh unit was very low (<25) and yolk breakage.
Data were analyzed by GLM procedure as a 5 × 5 factorial arrangement with dietary ASTA level and storage time as the main effects. SEM = standard error of mean values (n = 150).