Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 28;99(12):6946–6953. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.043

Table 2.

The main effect of probiotic or prebiotics on growth performance of broiler during the experiment.


Items
Probiotic
Prebiotic
SEM Sig
Pro0 Pro1 Pro2 SEM Sig MOS0 MOS1 MOS1.5
Feed intake (g)
 0–21 d 796.5b 868.2a 847.4a 10.159 0.0001 809.8b 841.1a,b 861.3b 10.16 0.005
 22–35 d 1,382.8 1,395.9 1,378.7 26.11 0.606 1,376.2 1,380.0 1,401.3 26.11 0.435
 0–35 d 2,179.4 2,264.1 2,226.1 29.69 0.15 2,186.0 2,221.1 2,262.6 29.70 0.21
Weight gain (g)
 0–21 d 447.3b 525.2a 514.87a,b 9.70 0.028 492.8 513.50 521.1 9.70 0.122
 22–35 d 897.3 b 907.1a 910.6a 25.24 0.04 848.9 935.3 932.9 25.24 0.93
 0–35 d 1,387.6 1,436.3 1,424.5 24.07 0.35 1,346.7b 1,445.8a 1,456.0a 24.07 0.01
Feed conversion ratio (g feed/g gain)
 0–21 d 1.64 1.66 1.65 0.03 0.859 1.65 1.64 1.65 0.03 0.944
 22–35 d 1.58 1.56 1.54 0.05 0.07 1.66 1.49 1.54 0.05 0.88
 0–35 d 1.59 1.59 1.57 0.03 0.81 1.64a 1.54b 1.58a,b 0.03 0.03

a,bWithin a row, means sharing different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05). Probiotic 0, 1, and 2 indicate inclusion of Protexin at the rate of 0, 1, and 2 g/kg of feed. MOS 0, 1, and 1.5 indicate inclusion of Active-MOS (mannan oligosaccharide) at the rate of 0, 1, and 1.5 g/kg of feed.

Abbreviation: Sig, significant.