Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 17;14:582728. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2020.582728

Table 2.

Classification performance averaged across subjects at different levels of signal-to-noise ratio (in dB) of the EMG signal using only the EMG signals or by the use of EEG and EMG signals together.

EMG 10dB EMG 3dB EMG 1.5dB EMG 1dB EMG 0.5dB EMG 0.1dB EMG
Recall
EMG 0.83 ± 0.15 0.79 ± 0.16 0.71 ± 0.22 0.76 ± 0.13 0.74 ± 0.15 0.74 ± 0.20 0.75 ± 0.17
EEG + EMG 0.89 ±0.06 0.86 ±0.08 0.82 ±0.13 0.85 ±0.07 0.84 ±0.08 0.84 ±0.09 0.83 ±0.8
Precision
EMG 0.81 ± 0.13 0.79 ± 0.14 0.70 ± 0.20 0.76 ± 0.12 0.74 ± 0.12 0.72 ± 0.17 0.76 ± 0.17
EEG + EMG 0.88 ±0.06 0.85 ±0.08 0.80 ±0.11 0.83 ±0.07 0.83 ±0.06 0.82 ±0.07 0.82 ±0.09
F1-Score
EMG 0.79 ± 0.15 0.75 ± 0.14 0.66 ± 0.21 0.71 ± 0.14 0.71 ± 0.15 0.69 ± 0.19 0.73 ± 0.18
EEG + EMG 0.89 ±0.06 0.86 ±0.07 0.80 ±0.12 0.84 ±0.06 0.82 ±0.07 0.83 ±0.08 0.82 ±0.08

Performance are evaluated in terms of recall, precision, and F1-score. Bold values highlight the best classification approach for each condition.