Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 25;48(11):0300060520965809. doi: 10.1177/0300060520965809

Table 1.

Comparison of the measured outcomes in each group of rats.

Group
Measured outcomes
W/D LIS PaO2, mmHg AI, %
Sham group, n = 20 2.3 ± 0.2 10 ± 2 99 ± 1 33.21 ± 2.17
I/R group, n = 20 5.1 ± 0.3a 21 ± 4a 91 ± 2a 51.03 ± 2.61a
I/R+Cur group, n = 20 3.2 ± 0.2b 13 ± 2b 96 ± 2b 37.71 ± 3.55b
I/R+Cur+antagomir-21 group, n = 20 4.9 ± 0.3c 19 ± 4c 91 ± 3c 48.03 ± 2.29b

Data presented as mean ± SD.

aP < 0.05 compared with the sham group; bP < 0.05 compared with the I/R group; cP< 0.05 compared with the I/R+Cur group; one-way analysis of variance and the least significant differences post-hoc test were used to compare the groups.

W/D, wet weight/dry weight; LIS, lung injury score; PaO2, pressure of oxygen in arterial blood; AI, apoptosis index; I/R, ischaemia-reperfusion; Cur, curcumin; antagomir-21, inhibitor of agomir-21.