Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 14;295(48):16267–16279. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA120.014591

Table 2.

Fit parameters obtained for MST experiments between N-MADD-4B and labeled NLG-1 (NLG*) or NLG-1 and labeled Ig (Ig*)

The N-MADD-4B/NLG* binding data (Fig. 4A), N-MADD-4B/NLG*/NLG-1 competition data (Fig. 4B), and NLG-1/Ig* binding data (Fig. 4C) were processed using either the Kd or the Hill model (see “Experimental procedures”).

Fit parameters Kd model Hill model
N-MADD-4B/ NLG*
    Kd or EC50 (nm) 465 578
    Kd confidence (nm) ±130 ±77
    S.E. (nm) 1.3 1.2
    Reduced χ2 1.6 0.8
    Signal/noise 14.9 13.1
    Hill coefficient 2.3
N-MADD-4B/NLG*/NLG-1
    Kd or EC50 (nm) 1428 1396
    Kd confidence (nm) ±488 ±285
    S.E. (nm) 0.8 0.8
    Reduced χ2 1.1 1.1
    Signal/noise 17.8 17.5
    Hill coefficient 1.0
NLG-1/Ig*
    Kd or EC50 (nm) 6139 5580
    Kd confidence (nm) ±1220 ±825
    S.E. (nm) 1.4 1.3
    Reduced χ2 0.5 0.2
    Signal/noise 16.1 16.3
    Hill coefficient 1.4